Back

Differential immunopeptidome analysis revealed cancer specific amino acid usage of HLA class-I antigens and novel neoantigens of colorectal cancer

Minegishi, Y.; Kiyotani, K.; Nemoto, K.; Inoue, Y.; Haga, Y.; Fujii, R.; Saichi, N.; Nagayama, S.; Ueda, K.

2021-06-22 cancer biology
10.1101/2021.04.09.439118 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding the properties of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) peptides (HLAp) is essential for cancer precision medicine, while the direct identification of HLAp from a tiny piece of clinical tissues by mass spectrometry (MS) is still confronted with technical challenges. Here, to overcome that hindrances, high-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry (FAIMS) is introduced to conduct differential ion mobility (DIM)-MS by seamless gas-phase fractionation optimal for scarce samples. The global-immunopeptidomics analysis enables in-depth identification of 44,785 HLAp, including 2 neoantigens with KRAS-G12V and CPPED1-R228Q from stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues obtained from 17 subjects. Comparison of tissue-based personal immunopeptidome disclosed cancer-specific processing of HLAp. Since the direct identification of neoantigens from CRC tissues suggests more potential neoantigens have yet to been identified, the targeted-immunopeptidomics by screening-oriented parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) has been established and identified two more neoantigens with oncogenic KRAS. The targeted-immunopeptidomics analysis clarifies the presentation of aimed neoantigens, including neoantigens that are unpredictable by computational algorithms. The comprehensive-immunopeptidomics approach combining the FAIMS-assisted DIM-MS and the screening-oriented PRM contributes the direct and effective identification of HLAp and emerging neoantigens from clinical tissue samples, as an advanced strategy to identify the authentic and recurrent neoantigens for cancer immunotherapy.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.