Back

Relationship between shear wave velocity and muscle activation is inconsistent across different muscle types

Bernabei, M.; Ludvig, D.; Sandercock, T. G.; Perreault, E. J.; Lee, S. S. M.

2021-07-31 bioengineering
10.1101/2021.04.07.438761 bioRxiv
Show abstract

There is an increasing use of shear wave ultrasound elastography to quantify mechanical properties of muscles under various conditions such as changes muscle length and levels of activation in healthy and pathological muscle. However, little is known about the variability in shear wave velocity among muscles as most studies investigate one specific muscle. The purpose of this study was to determine if the relationship between SWV and muscle activation is consistent across muscles with different architectures: biceps brachii, tibialis anterior, and medial gastrocnemius, All measures were made at matching levels of activation and approximately at the optimal length for each muscle to control for length-dependent changes in the relationship between activation and force or stiffness. We also conducted a control experiment to determine how the passive force within a muscle alters the relationship between muscle activation and shear wave velocity. The relationship between shear wave velocity-squared and activation above 10% MVC differed across muscles, with biceps brachii and medial gastrocnemius showing a lower slope than tibialis anterior. Shear wave velocity-squared also differed between muscles at the shortest length (p<0.001) and the increase in shear wave velocity-squared with muscle lengthening also differed between muscle types (p = 0.005) Muscle-specific differences could not be explained by the architectural features such as pennation angle, fiber length, and physiological cross-sectional area. Our results demonstrate that there is not a unique relationship between muscle activation and shear wave velocity, highlighting the importance of understanding the many factors contributing to shear wave propagation in muscle before elastography can be used to make quantitative comparisons across muscle types.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.