Back

Identification of decondensed large-scale chromatin regions by TSA-seq and their localization to a subset of chromatin domain boundaries

Gholamalamdari, O.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Y.; Belmont, A. S.

2021-04-06 genomics
10.1101/2021.04.06.438686 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Large-scale chromatin compaction is nonuniform across the human genome and correlates with gene expression and genome organization. Current methodologies for assessing large-scale chromatin compaction are indirect and largely based on assays that probe lower levels of chromatin organization, primarily at the level of the nucleosome and/or the local compaction of nearby nucleosomes. These assays assume a one-to-one correlation between local nucleosomal compaction and large-scale compaction of chromosomes that may not exist. Here we describe a method to identify interphase chromosome regions with relatively high levels of large-scale chromatin decondensation using TSA-seq, which produces a signal proportional to microscopic-scale distances relative to a defined nuclear compartment. TSA-seq scores that change rapidly as a function of genomic distance, detected by their higher slope values, identify decondensed large-scale chromatin domains (DLCDs), as then validated by 3D DNA-FISH. DLCDs map near a subset of chromatin domain boundaries, defined by Hi-C, which separate active and repressed chromatin domains and correspond to compartment, subcompartment, and some TAD boundaries. Most DLCDs can also be detected by high slopes of their Hi-C compartment score. In addition to local enrichment in cohesin (RAD21, SMC3) and CTCF, DLCDs show the highest local enrichment to super-enhancers, but are also locally enriched in transcription factors, histone-modifying complexes, chromatin mark readers, and chromatin remodeling complexes. The localization of these DLCDs to a subset of Hi-C chromatin domain boundaries that separate active versus inactive chromatin regions, as measured by two orthogonal genomic methods, suggests a distinct role for DLCDs in genome organization.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.