Back

Genetic diversity in facultatively sexual populations and its implications for the origins of self-incompatibility in algae and fungi

Smith, A. S. A.; Penington, S.; Letter, I.; Wilson, D. B.; Constable, G. W. A.

2021-04-04 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2021.04.04.438359 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The evolutionary mechanism that drove the establishment of self-incompatibility in early sexual eukaryotes is still a debated topic. While a number of competing hypotheses have been proposed, many have not received detailed theoretical attention. In particular, the hypothesis that self-incompatibility increases the benefits of genetic recombination in sexual haploids has been comparatively understudied. In this paper we address this topic by mathematically deriving how the probability of mating with a genetically distinct individual changes as a function of the presence or absence of self-incompatible mating type classes. We find that although populations with mating types successfully engage in sexual reproduction less frequently than their self-compatible competitors, they can nevertheless engage in useful sex with genetically distinct partners more frequently. This conclusion holds when the number of sexual reproductive events per generation is low (i.e. in small populations with low rates of facultative sexual reproduction). Finally we demonstrate the potential for frequency-dependent selection in competitive dynamics between self-compatible and self-incompatible types. These analytic results provide a baseline for studying the sex advantage enhancer model for the evolutionary origin of mating types within each specific hypothesis for the evolution of recombination. PACS87.23.-n Ecology and evolution, 87.23.Kg Dynamics of evolution, 02.50.Ey Stochastic processes 2000 MSC37N25: Dynamical systems in biology, 60J70: Applications of diffusion theory (population genetics, absorption problems, etc.)

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Theoretical Population Biology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.6%
2
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.2%
50% of probability mass above
3
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.2%
4
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
5
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
6
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
8
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.9%
10
Journal of Mathematical Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
11
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
12
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.1%
13
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
14
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.0%
16
Evolution Letters
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
18
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
20
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
21
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.6%