Back

Monitoring iron-sulfur cluster occupancy across the E. coli proteome using chemoproteomics

Bak, D. W.; Weerapana, E.

2021-04-01 biochemistry
10.1101/2021.04.01.438105 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Iron-sulfur (Fe-S) clusters are ubiquitous metallocofactors found across diverse protein families, where they perform myriad functions including redox chemistry, radical generation, and gene regulation. Monitoring Fe-S cluster occupancy in protein targets directly within native biological systems has been challenging. Commonly utilized spectroscopic methods to detect Fe-S clusters require purification of proteins prior to analysis. Global iron incorporation into the proteome can be monitored using radiolabeled iron, but limitations include the low resolution afforded by gel-based autoradiography. Here, we report the development of a mass spectrometry-based strategy to assess Fe-S cluster binding in a native proteome. This chemoproteomic strategy relies on monitoring changes in the reactivity of Fe-S cluster cysteine ligands upon disruption of Fe-S cluster incorporation. Application to E. coli cells cultured under iron-depleted conditions enabled monitoring of disruptions to Fe-S cluster incorporation broadly across the E. coli Fe-S proteome. Evaluation of E. coli deletion strains of three scaffold proteins within the Isc Fe-S biogenesis pathway enabled the identification of Fe-S clients that are reliant on each individual scaffold protein for proper cluster installation. Lastly, cysteine-reactivity changes characteristic of Fe-S ligands were used to identify previously unannotated Fe-S proteins, including the tRNA hydroxylase, TrhP, and a member of a family of membrane transporter ATPase subunits, DppD. In summary, the chemoproteomic strategy described herein provides a powerful tool to report on Fe-S cluster incorporation directly within a native proteome, to interrogate the role of scaffold and accessory proteins within Fe-S biogenesis pathways, and to identify previously uncharacterized Fe-S proteins.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.3%
3
Redox Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
5
Metallomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
7
RSC Chemical Biology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 27%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.0%
10
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.0%
12
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
13
ACS Infectious Diseases
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
14
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
15
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.9%
17
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
18
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
20
Biochemical Journal
80 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
21
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
22
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
23
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
24
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
25
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
26
ChemBioChem
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
27
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.7%
28
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.7%
29
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
30
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%