Migration of households from New York City and the Second Peak in Covid-19 cases in New Jersey, Connecticut and New York Counties.
Schulman, A. T.; Bhanot, G.
Show abstract
The five boroughs of New York City (NYC) were early epicenters of the Covid-19 pandemic in the United States, with over 380,000 cases by May 31. High caseloads were also seen in nearby counties in New Jersey (NJ), Connecticut (CT) and New York (NY). The pandemic started in the area in March with an exponential rise in the number of daily cases, peaked in early April, briefly declined, and then, showed clear signs of a second peak in several counties. We will show that despite control measures such as lockdown and restriction of movement during the exponential rise in daily cases, there was a significant net migration of households from NYC boroughs to the neighboring counties in NJ, CT and NY State. We propose that the second peak in daily cases in these counties around NYC was due, in part, to the movement of people from NYC boroughs to these counties. We estimate the movement of people using "Change of Address" (CoA) data from the US Postal Service, provided under the "Freedom of Information Act" of 1967. To identify the timing of the second peak and the number of cases in it, we use a previously proposed SIR model, which accurately describes the early stages of the coronavirus pandemic in European countries. Subtracting the model fits from the data identified, we establish the timing and the number of cases, NCS, in the second peak. We then related the number of cases in the second peak to the county population density, P, and the excess Change of Address, ECoA, into each county using the simple model [Formula] which fits the data very well with = 0.68, {beta} = 0.31 (R2 = 0.74, p = 1.3e-8). We also find that the time between the first and second peaks was proportional to the distance of the county seat from NY Penn Station, suggesting that this migration of households and disease was a directed flow and not a diffusion process. Our analysis provides a simple method to use change of address data to track the spread of an infectious agent, such as SARS-Cov-2, due to migrations away from epicenters during the initial stages of a pandemic.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Long-term changes in human mobility responses to COVID-19-related information in Japan 95%
- Which COVID policies are most effective? A Bayesian analysis of COVID-19 by jurisdiction 95%
- Using mobile phone data to estimate dynamic population changes and improve the understanding of a pandemic: A case study in Andorra 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Heterogeneous local dynamics revealed by classification analysis of spatially disaggregated time series data 95%
- Assessing the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Belgium by means of an extended SEIQRD model and public mobility data 94%
- Globally Local: Hyper-local Modeling for Accurate Forecast of COVID-19 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Intra-county modeling of COVID-19 infection with human mobility: assessing spatial heterogeneity with business traffic, age and race 95%
- Quantifying the importance and location of SARS-CoV-2 transmission events in large metropolitan areas 95%
- Characterizing Population-level Changes in Human Behavior during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.