Back

Origins of cancer genome complexity revealed by haplotype-resolved genomic analysis of evolution of Barretts esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma

Zhang, C.-Z.; Stachler, M.; Bao, C.; Tourdot, R.; Brunette, G. J.; Stewart, C.; Sun, L.; Baba, H.; Watanabe, M.; Agoston, A.; Jajoo, K.; Nason, K.; Davison, J.; Getz, G.; Wang, K.; Imamura, Y.; Odze, R.; Bass, A.

2021-03-28 genomics
10.1101/2021.03.26.437288 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The progression of precancerous lesions to malignancy is often accompanied by increasing complexity of chromosomal alterations but how these alterations arise is poorly understood. Here we performed haplotype-specific analysis of chromosomal copy-number evolution in the progression of Barretts esophagus (BE) to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) on multiregional whole-genome sequencing data of BE with dysplasia and microscopic EAC foci. We identified distinct patterns of copy-number evolution indicating multigenerational chromosomal instability that is initiated by cell division errors but propagated only after p53 loss. While abnormal mitosis, including whole-genome duplication, underlies chromosomal copy-number changes, segmental alterations display signatures of successive breakage-fusion-bridge cycles and chromothripsis of unstable dicentric chromosomes. Our analysis elucidates how multigenerational chromosomal instability generates copy-number variation in BE cells, precipitates complex alterations including DNA amplifications, and promotes their independent clonal expansion and transformation. In particular, we suggest sloping copy-number variation as a signature of ongoing chromosomal instability that precedes copy-number complexity. These findings suggest copy-number heterogeneity in advanced cancers originates from chromosomal instability in precancerous cells and such instability may be identified from the presence of sloping copy-number variation in bulk sequencing data.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.