Back

Genomic analysis of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma

Izadi, F.; Sharpe, B. P.; Breininger, S. P.; Secrier, M.; Gibson, J.; Walker, R. C.; Rahman, S.; Devonshire, G.; Lloyd, M. A.; Walters, Z. S.; Fitzgerald, R. C.; Rose-Zerilli, M. J. J.; Underwood, T. J.; Oesophageal Cancer Clinical and Molecular Stratification (OCCAMS) Consortium,

2021-03-28 genomics
10.1101/2021.03.26.437144 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery is the standard of care for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Unfortunately, response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is poor (<20%), as is the overall survival benefit at 5 years (5%). The EAC genome is complex and heterogeneous between patients, and it is not yet understood whether specific mutational patterns may result in chemotherapy sensitivity or resistance. To identify associations between genomic events and response to NAC in EAC, a comparative genomic analysis was performed in 65 patients with extensive clinical and pathological annotation using whole-genome sequencing (WGS). We defined response using Mandard Tumor Regression Grade (TRG), with responders classified as TRG1-2 (n=27) and non-responders classified as TRG4-5 (n=38). We report a higher non-synonymous mutation burden in responders (median 2.08/Mb vs 1.70/Mb, P=0.036) and elevated copy number variation in non-responders (282 vs 136/patient, P<0.001). We identified copy number variants unique to each group in our cohort, with cell cycle (CDKN2A, CCND1), c-Myc (MYC), RTK/PIK3 (KRAS, EGFR) and gastrointestinal differentiation (GATA6) pathway genes being specifically altered in non-responders. Of note, NAV3 mutations were exclusively present in the non-responder group with a frequency of 22%. Thus, lower mutation burden, higher chromosomal instability and specific copy number alterations are associated with resistance to NAC.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.4%
3
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
5
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.1%
7
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
8
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
10
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
15
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
16
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
20
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
30
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.5%