Back

Some Mathematics for the Method of Pooled PCR Test

Otsu, N.

2021-03-29 epidemiology
10.1101/2021.03.26.21254430
Show abstract

At the time of the worldwide COVID-19 disaster, the author learned about the pooled (RT-) PCR test from the news. From the common sense of individual tests, the idea of mixing multiple samples seems taboo, however in fact many samples can be tested with a smaller number of tests by the method. As a retired researcher of mathematical engineering, the author was deeply interested in the idea and absorbed in the mathematical formulation and intensive analysis of the method. Later, he found that the original basic equation was already proposed in the old (1943) treatise [1] and so many related research works have been done and available as materials on the web [2], although many of those seem to be based on qualitative or intuitive analysis. In that sense, some of the analysis here seems to be already known in the field, but some results might be novel, such as boundary conditions, derivation of limit values, estimation of infection rate and adaptive optimization scheme of pool test, strict extension to multi-stage pool test, and explicit derivation of asymptotic approximate solutions of optimal pooling number and achieved efficiency measure, etc. In any case, he decided to put it together here as a material rather than a formal treatise, hoping that the results here would be useful for deeper mathematical insights into and better understanding of the pool inspection, and also in its actual practice.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 28%
16.1%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 14%
10.7%
3
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
based on 17 papers
Top 0.3%
9.1%
4
Infectious Disease Modelling
based on 50 papers
Top 1%
5.6%
5
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
5.3%
6
Royal Society Open Science
based on 49 papers
Top 1%
2.9%
7
Epidemiology and Infection
based on 80 papers
Top 2%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Physics
based on 11 papers
Top 0.4%
2.4%
9
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
10
Mathematical Biosciences
based on 15 papers
Top 0.9%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 16%
1.6%
12
Biology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.5%
1.4%
13
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
14
Journal of Theoretical Biology
based on 29 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
15
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
based on 17 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Science of The Total Environment
based on 80 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
17
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 21%
0.8%
18
Applied Sciences
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Genetics
based on 32 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
20
COVID
based on 12 papers
Top 0.4%
0.7%
21
Statistics in Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 1.0%
0.7%
22
BMC Medical Research Methodology
based on 41 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
23
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 17%
0.7%
24
JMIRx Med
based on 29 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
25
Computers in Biology and Medicine
based on 39 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
26
Biology Methods and Protocols
based on 19 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
27
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 11%
0.7%