Back

Quantifying diversity, connectivity, and environmental resistance in dendritic ecological networks

Chafin, T. K.; Mussmann, S. M.; Douglas, M. R.; Douglas, M. E.

2021-03-26 ecology
10.1101/2021.03.25.437078 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIA central theme in landscape ecology is the translation of individual movements within a population by deconstructing/interpreting the components of its topographical environment. Most such endeavors rely heavily on the concept of landscape resistance - a composite of an arbitrary number of features/covariates that, when identified/compiled, yield a surface inversely related to net movement. However, the statistical methodologies underlying this compilation have limited applicability when applied to dendritic ecological networks (DENs), including riverscapes. C_LIO_LIHerein we provide an analytical framework (ResistNet) that more appropriately annotates DEN segments by first aligning individual genetic distances with environmental covariates within a graph structure, then employing a genetic algorithm to optimise a composite model. C_LIO_LIWe evaluated the efficacy of our method by first testing it in silico across an array of sampling designs, spatial trajectories, and levels of complexity, then applying it in an empirical case study involving 13,218 ddRAD loci from N=762 Speckled Dace (Leuciscidae: Rhinichthys osculus), sampled across N=78 Colorado River localities. By doing so, we underscored the utility of ResistNet within a large-scale conservation study, as well as identified prerequisites for its appropriate application. C_LIO_LIOur contemporary framework not only allows an interpretation of meta-population/meta-community structure across DENs, but also highlights several innovative applications. These are: (a) Expanding an ongoing study design, and thus its hypotheses, into yet unsampled temporal and/or spatial arenas, and; (b) Promoting multi-species management through comparative analyses that extend across species and/or drainages. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.