Back

Identifying Brain Regions Related to Word Prediction During Listening to Japanese Speech by Combining a LSTM Language Model and MEG

Takahashi, Y.; Oseki, Y.; Sakai, H.; Makuuchi, M.; Osu, R.

2021-03-25 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.03.25.436887 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recently, a neuroscientific approach has revealed that humans understand language while subconsciously predicting the next word from the preceding context. Most studies on human word prediction have investigated the correlations between brain activity while reading or listening to sentences on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and the predictive difficulty of each word in a sentence calculated by the N-gram language model. However, because of its low temporal resolution, fMRI is not optimal for identifying the changes in brain activity that accompany language comprehension. In addition, the N-gram language model is a simple computational structure that does not account for the structure of the human brain. Furthermore, it is necessary for humans to retain information prior to the N-1 word in order to form a contextual understanding of a presented story. Therefore, in the present study, we measured brain activity using magnetoencephalography (MEG), which has a higher temporal resolution than fMRI, and calculated the prediction difficulty of words using a long short-term memory language model (LSTMLM), which is based on a neural network inspired by the structure of the human brain and has longer information retention than the N-gram language model. We then identified the brain regions involved in language prediction during Japanese-language speech listening using encoding and decoding analyses. In addition to surprisal-related regions revealed in previous studies, such as the superior temporal gyrus, fusiform gyrus, and temporal pole, we also found relationships between surprisal and brain activity in other regions, including the insula, superior temporal sulcus, and middle temporal gyrus, which are believed to be involved in longer-term, sentence-level cognitive processing.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.3%
4
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
5
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
7
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
8
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.9%
10
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
12
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
14
Neurobiology of Language
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
16
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
17
Neuroscience Research
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
18
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Cognitive Neurodynamics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
21
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
Science Bulletin
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
28
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%