Back

Long-Term Metabolomics Reference Material

Gouveia, G. J.; Shaver, A. O.; Garcia, B. M.; Morse, A. M.; Andersen, E. C.; Edison, A. S.; McIntyre, L. M.

2021-03-24 biochemistry
10.1101/2021.03.24.436834 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The use of quality control samples in metabolomics ensures data quality, reproducibility and comparability between studies, analytical platforms and laboratories. Long-term, stable and sustainable reference materials (RMs) are a critical component of the QA/QC system, however, the limited selection of currently available matrix matched RMs reduce their applicability for widespread use. To produce a RM in any context, for any matrix that is robust to changes over the course of time we developed IBAT (Iterative Batch Averaging meThod). To illustrate this method, we generated 11 independently grown E. coli batches and made a RM over the course of 10 IBAT iterations. We measured the variance of these materials by NMR and showed that IBAT produces a stable and sustainable RM over time. This E. coli RM was then used as food source to produce a C. elegans RM for a metabolomics experiment. The metabolite extraction of this material alongside 41 independently grown individual C. elegans samples of the same genotype, allowed to estimate the proportion of sample variation in pre-analytical steps. From the NMR data, we found that 40% of the metabolite variance is due to the metabolite extraction process and analysis and 60% is due to sample-to-sample variance. The availability of RMs in untargeted metabolomics is one of the predominant needs of the metabolomics community that reach beyond quality control practices. IBAT addresses this need by facilitating the production of biologically relevant RMs and increasing their widespread use.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.2%
2
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
3
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.8%
6
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Metabolomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
10
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
11
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
14
Nature Protocols
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
15
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
16
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
17
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.6%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.6%
21
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
22
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%