Definition, modeling and detection of saccades in the face of post-saccadic oscillations
Schweitzer, R.; Rolfs, M.
Show abstract
When analyzing eye tracking data, one of the central tasks is the detection of saccades. Although many automatic saccade detection algorithms exist, the field still debates how to deal with brief periods of instability around saccade offset, so-called post-saccadic oscillations (PSOs), which are especially prominent in todays widely used video-based eye tracking techniques. There is good evidence that PSOs are caused by inertial forces that act on the elastic components of the eye, such as the iris or the lens. As this relative movement can greatly distort estimates of saccade metrics, especially saccade duration and peak velocity, video-based eye tracking has recurrently been considered unsuitable for measuring saccade kinematics. In this chapter, we review recent biophysical models that describe the relationship between pupil motion and eyeball motion. We found that these models were well capable of accurately reproducing saccade trajectories and implemented a framework for the simulation of saccades, PSOs, and fixations, which can be used - just like datasets hand-labelled by human experts - to evaluate detection algorithms and train statistical models. Moreover, as only pupil and corneal-reflection signals are observable in video-based eye tracking, one may also be able to use these models to predict the unobservable motion of the eyeball. Testing these predictions by analyzing saccade data that was registered with video-based and search-coil eye tracking techniques revealed strong relationships between the two types of measurements, especially when saccade offset is defined as the onset of the PSO. To enable eye tracking researchers to make use of this definition, we present and evaluate two novel algorithms - one based on eye-movement direction inversion, one based on linear classifiers previously trained on simulation data. These algorithms allow for the detection of PSO onset with high fidelity. Even though PSOs may still pose problems for a range of eye tracking applications, the techniques described here may help to alleviate these.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Common properties of visually-guided saccadic behavior and bottom-up attention in marmoset, macaque, and human 94%
- Predictive posture stabilization before contact with moving objects: equivalence of smooth pursuit tracking and peripheral vision 93%
- Risk optimization during ongoing movement: Insights from movement and gaze behavior in throwing 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tracking and perceiving diverse motion signals: Directional biases in human smooth pursuit and perception 93%
- Real-world visual search goes beyond eye movements: Active searchers select 3D scene viewpoints too 92%
- ConfluentFUCCI for fully-automated analysis of cell-cycle progression in a highly dense collective of migrating cells 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.