Back

COVID-19 RT-PCR diagnostic assay sensitivity and SARS-CoV-2 transmission: A missing link?

Sahajpal, N. S.; Chin Lip Hon, E.; Dallaire, S.; Williams, C.; Ananth, S.; Mondal, A. K.; Rojiani, A. M.; Hegde, M.; Kolhe, R.

2021-03-26 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.03.24.21254271 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe sensitivity of commercially available RT-PCR assays varies over 10,000 fold, ranging from 10 to 20,000 viral copies/ml. The reporting of high Ct value results has been under scrutiny, as the clinical significance of these values is not yet completely understood. The early detection of infected individuals (high Ct results) in the pre-symptomatic phase of the disease using highly sensitive RT-PCR methods has been argued as a strategy to prevent transmission, while on the contrary, the reporting of high Ct has been criticized as false-positive results causing unnecessary testing and having several negative implications. The purpose of this study was to verify the presence of SARS-CoV-2 genomes in samples with a wide range of RT-PCR Ct values including samples with high Ct (37 to 42) using next-generation sequencing (NGS). MethodsThe study evaluated a total of 547 previously positive samples tested with the PerkinElmer(R) New Coronavirus Nucleic Acid Detection RT-PCR kit. The samples included in this study ranged from Ct values of 17-42, with 44 samples having a Ct > 37. Of the 547 samples, 149 were sequenced using PerkinElmer NEXTFLEX Variant-Seq SARS-CoV2 assay on NovaSeq 6000, and 398 samples were sequenced using Illumina SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viral panel kits using the NextSeq 500/550 system. ResultsBetween the two clinical laboratories, a total of [~]1.95 million samples were tested using the FDA-EUA PerkinElmer(R) New Coronavirus RT-PCR assay. Of the 1.95 million samples, [~]1.72 million were negative, [~]250,000 positive, and [~]16,500 in the range of 37-42. Of the 547 samples sequenced, the percentage of sequencing reads that aligned to the SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan-hu-1 reference genome (NC_045512.2) ranged from 25.5% to 99.69%. All samples sequenced showed high sequence specificity to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Low Ct samples showed complete uniform coverage across the entire 29kb SAR-CoV-2 genome. The average coverage in samples with high Ct (>37) was found to be 55.5% (range 16.1-99.2%). However, as sample Ct increased, a gradual decrease in coverage uniformity was observed for few samples. ConclusionThis study demonstrates for the first time that the viral RNA is present in the high Ct value range of 37-42 and the sequence is unique to SARS-CoV-2 confirmed using two separate sequencing assays. This confirms that the detected Ct values are reflective of the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and they are not an artifact or contamination. In light of the recent work highlighting the majority of transmission being pre-symptomatic/ asymptomatic, and high Ct results being observed at both the early and late phases of infection warrants further investigation into the clinical utility of high Ct results to curtail the spread of the virus.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.3%
3
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
4
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
5
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
8
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
9
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
10
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
14
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
15
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
16
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Journal of Clinical Virology Plus
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
18
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
24
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
28
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%