Evaluation of the ROX index in SARS-CoV-2 Acute Respiratory failure treated with both High-Flow Nasal Oxygen (HFNO) and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)
Ghani, H.; Shaw, M.; Pyae, P.; Cama, R.; Prabhakar, M.; Navarra, A.; Lee, J. Y. J.; Chua, F.; Mogal, R.; Barlow, A.; Nordin, N.; Vancheeswaran, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundNon-invasive respiratory support including high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO), and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) have been used to provide therapy in selected SARS-CoV-2 patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). The value of the ROX index, a validated benchmark for outcomes in HFNO is unknown in CPAP. ObjectiveCan the ROX, a validated benchmark in HFNO be used for measuring treatment outcomes of CPAP in SARS-COV-2 ARF? Study Design and MethodsA non-randomised prospective protocol driven observational non-intensive care unit study in 130 SARS-COV-2 patients with ARF treated with non-invasive therapy from March 2020 to January 2021. The primary end point was failure of therapy (death or escalation). Secondary outcomes included time to failure including invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or death, the effect of escalation to CPAP from HFNO and the utility of ROX in ARF. ResultsHFNO was better than CPAP in treating SARS-COV-2 ARF: 17/35 (48.5%) with successful HFNO therapy versus 24/95 (25.2%) with CPAP. The ROX index was more sensitive to outcomes with CPAP compared to HFNO and distinguished treatment failure early at 1, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours with the highest sensitivity at 24 hours (ROX-24h). The AUC for the ROX-24h was 0.77 for HFNO (P<0.0001), and 0.84 for CPAP (P<0.0001). The ROX-24h cut-points predicted failure with HFNO when < 3.9 (PPV 71%, NPV 75%) and CPAP < 4.3 (PPV 75%, NPV 91%). For success, ROX-24h cut-points of 7.6 for HFNO (PPV 85%, NPV 48%) and 6.1 for CPAP (PPV 88%, NPV 62%) were observed. Escalation from HFNO to CPAP was mostly not successful. ConclusionARF in SARS-COV-2 can be successfully managed by non-invasive support. The ROX index, validated for HFNO, provides a timely, low resource measure for both HFNO and CPAP avoiding delayed intubation. Trial registrationStudy approved by NHS HRAREC (20/HRA/2344;ethics 283888) KEY MESSAGEO_ST_ABSWhat is the key question?C_ST_ABSCan the ROX, a validated benchmark in high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) be used for measuring treatment outcomes of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in SARS-COV-2 ARF? What is the bottom line?The ROX index, validated for HFNO, provides a timely, low resource measure for both HFNO and CPAP support avoiding delayed intubation. Why read on?The present study compares the efficacy of HFNO and CPAP, two common globally used modalities of treatment for SARS-CoV-2 and notes the superior utility of the ROX-24h in CPAP to predict outcome, enabling timely escalation decisions.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes of adult patients admitted with COVID-19 in East London: a retrospective cohort analysis 94%
- Two-way remote monitoring allows effective and realistic provision of home-NIV to COPD patients with persistent hypercapnia 94%
- A new method to measure inter-breath intervals in infants for the assessment of apnoea and respiratory dynamics 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of Oxygen Saturation Targets on Neurologic Outcomes after Cardiac Arrest: A Secondary Analysis of the PILOT Trial 91%
- Effect of Ventilator Mode on Ventilator-Free Days in Critically Ill Adults: A Randomized Trial 91%
- Development and Prospective Validation of a Transparent Deep Learning Algorithm for Predicting Need for Mechanical Ventilation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Cardiovascular disease and severe hypoxemia associated with higher rates of non-invasive respiratory support failure in COVID-19 94%
- A Multicenter Evaluation of Blood Purification with Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Preliminary Report 92%
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome and shunt detection with bubble studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Outcomes of Mechanically Ventilated Patients with COVID-19 Associated Respiratory Failure 94%
- Observational study of changes in utilization and outcomes in non-invasive ventilation in COVID-19 94%
- Hemodynamic profiles by non-invasive monitoring of cardiac index and vascular tone in acute heart failure patients in the emergency department: external validation and clinical outcomes 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.