Back

Linking habitat and population dynamics to inform conservation benchmarks for data-limited salmon stocks

Atlas, W. I.; Holt, C. A.; Selbie, D. T.; Connors, B. M.; Cox-Rogers, S.; Carr-Harris, C.; Hertz, E.; Moore, J. W.

2021-03-23 ecology
10.1101/2021.03.22.436497 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Management of data-limited populations is a key challenge to the sustainability of fisheries around the world. For example, sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) spawn and rear in many remote coastal watersheds of British Columbia (BC), Canada, making population assessment a challenge. Estimating conservation and management targets for these populations is particularly relevant given their importance to First Nations and commercial fisheries. Most sockeye salmon have obligate lake-rearing as juveniles, and total abundance is typically limited by production in rearing lakes. Although methods have been developed to estimate population capacity based on nursery lake photosynthetic rate (PR) and lake area or volume, they have not yet been widely incorporated into stock-recruit analyses. We tested the value of combining lake-based capacity estimates with traditional stock-recruit based approaches to assess population status using a hierarchical-Bayesian stock-recruit model for 70 populations across coastal BC. This analysis revealed regional variation in sockeye population productivity (Ricker ), with coastal stocks exhibiting lower mean productivity than those in interior watersheds. Using moderately-informative PR estimates of capacity as priors reduced model uncertainty, with a more than five-fold reduction in credible interval width for estimates of conservation benchmarks (e.g. SMAX - spawner abundance at carrying capacity). We estimated that almost half of these remote sockeye stocks are below one commonly applied conservation benchmarks (SMSY), despite substantial reductions in fishing pressure in recent decades. Thus, habitat-based capacity estimates can dramatically reduce scientific uncertainty in model estimates of management targets that underpin sustainable sockeye fisheries. More generally, our analysis reveals opportunities to integrate spatial analyses of habitat characteristics with population models to inform conservation and management of exploited species where population data are limited.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
3
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
8
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
9
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
10
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
13
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
18
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
20
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
21
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
25
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
27
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
29
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
30
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%