Adapting French COVID-19 vaccination campaign duration to variant dissemination
Pageaud, S.; Ponthus, N.; Gauchon, R.; Pothier, C.; Rigotti, C.; Eyraud-Loisel, A.; Bertoglio, J.-P.; Bienvenüe, A.; Gueyffier, F.; Vanhems, P.; Leboisne, N.; Iwaz, J.; Loisel, S.; Roy, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 virus has caused a major international health crisis with serious consequences in terms of public health and economy. In France, two lockdown periods were decided in 2020 to avoid the saturation of intensive care units (ICU) and an increase in mortality. The rapid dissemination of variant SARS-CoV-2 VOC 202012/01 has strongly influenced the course of the epidemic. Vaccines have been rapidly developed. Their efficacy against the severe forms of the disease has been established, and their efficacy against disease transmission is under evaluation. The aim of this paper is to compare the efficacy of several vaccination strategies in the presence of variants in controlling the COVID-19 epidemic through population immunity. MethodsAn agent-based model was designed to simulate with different scenarios the evolution of COVID-19 pandemic in France over 2021 and 2022. The simulations were carried out ignoring the occurrence of variants then taking into account their diffusion over time. The expected effects of three Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (Relaxed-NPI, Intensive-NPI, and Extended-NPI) to limit the epidemic extension were compared. The expected efficacy of vaccines were the values recently estimated in preventing severe forms of the disease (75% and 94%) for the current used vaccines in France (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna since January 11, 2021, and AstraZeneca since February 2, 2021). All vaccination campaigns reproduced an advanced age-based priority advised by the Haute Autorite de Sante. Putative reductions of virus transmission were fixed at 0, 50, 75 and 90%. The effects of four vaccination campaign durations (6-month, 12-month, 18-month and 24-month) were compared. ResultsIn the absence of vaccination, the presence of variants led to reject the Relaxed-NPI because of a high expected number of deaths (170 to 210 thousands) and the significant overload of ICUs from which 35 thousand patients would be deprived. In comparison with the situation without vaccination, the number of deaths was divided by 7 without ICU saturation with a 6-month vaccination campaign. A 12-month campaign would divide the number of death by 3 with Intensive-NPI and by 6 with Extended-NPI (the latter being necessary to avoid ICU saturation). With 18-month and 24-month vaccination campaigns without Extended-NPI, the number of deaths and ICU admissions would explode. ConclusionAmong the four compared strategies the 6-month vaccination campaign seems to be the best response to changes in the dynamics of the epidemic due to the variants. The race against the COVID-19 epidemic is a race of vaccination strategy. Any further vaccination delay would increase the need of strengthened measures such as Extended-NPI to limit the number of deaths and avoid ICU saturation.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Modeling the initial phase of COVID-19 epidemic: The role of age and disease severity in the Basque Country, Spain 97%
- Modeling the effect of vaccination strategies in an Excel spreadsheet: The rate of vaccination, and not only the vaccination coverage, is a determinant for containing COVID-19 in urban areas 97%
- Vaccination and Variants: retrospective model for the evolution of Covid-19 in Italy 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling the Test, Trace and Quarantine Strategy to Control the COVID-19 Epidemic in the State of São Paulo, Brazil 97%
- Incorporating the mutational landscape of SARS-COV-2 variants and case-dependent vaccination rates into epidemic models 96%
- Switched forced SEIRDV compartmental models to monitor COVID-19 spread and immunization in Italy 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.