Back

The course of the UK COVID 19 pandemic; no measurable impact of new variants.

Ellis, D.; Mukherjee, S.; Papadopoulos, D.; Chari, N.; Ukwu, U.; Charitopoulos, K.; Donkov, I.; Bishara, S.

2021-03-17 epidemiology
10.1101/2021.03.16.21253534 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionIn November 2020, a new SARS-COV-2 variant or the Kent variant emerged in the UK, and became the dominant UK SARS-COV-2 variant, demonstrating faster transmission than the original variant, which rapidly died out. However, it is unknown if this altered the overall course of the pandemic as genomic analysis was not common place at the outset and other factors such as the climate could alter the viral transmission rate over time. We aimed to test the hypothesis that the overall observed viral transmission was not altered by the emergence of the new variant, by testing a model generated earlier in the pandemic based on lockdown stringency, temperature and humidity. MethodsFrom 1/1/20 to 4/2/21, the daily incidence of SARS-COV-2 deaths and the overall stringency of National Lockdown policy on each day was extracted from the Oxford University Government response tracker. The daily average temperature and humidity for London was extracted from Wunderground.com. The viral reproductive rate was calculated on a daily basis from the daily mortality data for each day. The correlation between log10 of viral reproductive rate and lockdown stringency and weather parameters were compared by Pearson correlation to determine the time lag associated with the greatest correlation. A multivariate model for the log10 of viral reproductive rate was constructed using lockdown stringency, temperature and humidity for the period 1/1/20 to 30/9/20. This model was extrapolated forward from 1/10/20 to 4/2/21 and the predicted viral reproductive rate, daily mortality and cumulative mortality were compared with official data. ResultsOn multivariate linear regression, the optimal model had and R2 0f 0.833 for prediction of log10 viral reproductive rate 13 days later in the model construction period, with (coefficient, probability) lockdown stringency (-0.0109, p=0.0000), humidity (0.0038, p=0.0041) and temperature (-0.0035, p=0.0008). When extrapolated to the validation period (1/10/20 to 4/2/21), the model was highly correlated with daily (Pearson coefficient 0.88, p=0.0000) and cumulated SARS-COV-2 mortality (Pearson coefficient 0.99, p=0.0000). ConclusionThe course of the SARS-COV-2 pandemic in the UK seems highly predicted by an earlier model based on the lockdown stringency, humidity and temperature and unaltered by the emergence of a newer viral genotype.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.3%
3
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.4%
4
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.7%
9
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
10
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
15
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Journal of General Virology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%