Recurrent structural variations of lncRNA gene CCDC26 in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma
Zou, L.
Show abstract
We report recurrent somatic structural variations (SVs) involving long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) CCDC26 in 13% of Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma (DIPG) patients. We validate our findings using whole genome sequencing data from two independent patient cohorts. CCDC26 SVs cause increased expression of CCDC26 gene in patients. In addition, CCDC26 expression is associated with elevated expression of MYC and proliferation signature. Our findings identify CCDC26 as a novel significantly mutated gene in DIPG and highlight the importance of structural variations in pediatric brain cancer.
Matching journals
The top 16 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- IGenomic answers for children: Dynamic analyses of >1000 pediatric rare disease genomes 92%
- Poison exon annotations improve the yield of clinically relevant variants in genomic diagnostic testing 91%
- Rare variants found in clinical gene panels illuminate the genetic and allelic architecture of orofacial clefting 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A subset of pediatric thalamic gliomas share a distinct DNA methylation profile, H3K27me3 loss and frequent alteration of EGFR 93%
- Pediatric High Grade Glioma Resources From the Children’s Brain Tumor Tissue Consortium (CBTTC) and Pediatric Brain Tumor Atlas (PBTA) 92%
- Transcriptomic landscape identifies two unrecognized ependymoma subtypes and novel pathways in medulloblastoma 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrated germline and somatic molecular profiling to detect cancer predisposition has a high clinical impact in poor-prognosis paediatric cancer 90%
- Zinc Finger MYND-Type Containing 8 (ZMYND8) is epigenetically regulated in mutant Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) glioma to promote radioresistance 89%
- The genomic landscape of early stage ovarian high grade serous carcinoma 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.