Back

Community Evaluation of Glycoproteomics Informatics Solutions Reveals High-Performance Search Strategies of Glycopeptide Data

Kawahara, R.; Alagesan, K.; Bern, M.; Cao, W.; Chalkley, R. J.; Cheng, K.; Choo, M. S.; Edwards, N.; Goldman, R.; Hoffmann, M.; Hu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Kim, J. Y.; Kletter, D.; Liquet-Weiland, B.; Liu, M.; Mechref, Y.; Meng, B.; Neelamegham, S.; Nguyen-Khuong, T.; Nilsson, J.; Pap, A.; Park, G. W.; Parker, B. L.; Pegg, C. L.; Penninger, J. M.; Phung, T. K.; Pioch, M.; Rapp, E.; Sakalli, E.; Sanda, M.; Shulz, B. L.; Scott, N. E.; Sofronov, G.; Stadlmann, J.; Vakhrushev, S. Y.; Woo, C. M.; Wu, H.-Y.; Yang, P.; Ying, W.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zaia, J.; Haslam, S. M.; Palmisano, G.; Yoo, J. S

2021-03-15 biochemistry
10.1101/2021.03.14.435332 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Glycoproteome profiling (glycoproteomics) is a powerful yet analytically challenging research tool. The complex tandem mass spectra generated from glycopeptide mixtures require sophisticated analysis pipelines for structural determination. Diverse software aiding the process have appeared, but their relative performance remains untested. Conducted through the HUPO Human Proteome Project - Human Glycoproteomics Initiative, this community study, comprising both developers and users of glycoproteomics software, evaluates the performance of informatics solutions for system-wide glycopeptide analysis. Mass spectrometry-based glycoproteomics datasets from human serum were shared with all teams. The relative team performance for N- and O-glycopeptide data analysis was comprehensively established and validated through orthogonal performance tests. Excitingly, several high-performance glycoproteomics informatics solutions were identified. While the study illustrated that significant informatics challenges remain, as indicated by a high discordance between annotated glycopeptides, lists of high-confidence (consensus) glycopeptides were compiled from the standardised team reports. Deep analysis of the performance data revealed key performance-associated search variables and led to recommendations for improved "high coverage" and "high accuracy" glycoproteomics search strategies. This study concludes that diverse software for comprehensive glycopeptide data analysis exist, points to several high-performance search strategies, and specifies key variables that may guide future software developments and assist informatics decision-making in glycoproteomics.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.