A Synthesis of the Many Errors and Learning Processes of Visuomotor Adaptation
Morehead, J. R.; Orban de Xivry, J.-J.
Show abstract
Visuomotor adaptation has one of the oldest experimental histories in psychology and neuroscience, yet its precise nature has always been a topic of debate. Here we offer a survey and synthesis of recent work on visuomotor adaptation that we hope will prove illuminating for this ongoing dialogue. We discuss three types of error signals that drive learning in adaptation tasks: task performance error, sensory prediction-error, and a binary target hitting error. Each of these errors has been shown to drive distinct learning processes. Namely, both target hitting errors and putative sensory prediction-errors drive an implicit change in visuomotor maps, while task performance error drives learning of explicit strategy use and non-motor decision-making. Each of these learning processes contributes to the overall learning that takes place in visuomotor adaptation tasks, and although the learning processes and error signals are independent, they interact in a complex manner. We outline many task contexts where the operation of these processes is counter-intuitive and offer general guidelines for their control, measurement and interpretation. We believe this new framework unifies several disparate threads of research in sensorimotor adaptation that often seem in conflict. We conclude by explaining how this more nuanced understanding of errors and learning processes could lend itself to the analysis of other types of sensorimotor adaptation, of motor skill learning, of the neural processing underlying sensorimotor adaptation in humans, of animal models and of brain computer interfaces.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Different time scales of common-cause evidence shape multisensory integration, recalibration and motor adaptation 95%
- Acoustic stimulation increases implicit adaptation in sensorimotor adaptation 95%
- Shared internal models for feedforward and feedback control of arm dynamics in non-human primates 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cognitive control and automatic interference in mind and brain: A unified model of saccadic inhibition and countermanding 96%
- Control adjustment costs limit goal flexibility: Empirical evidence and a computational account 94%
- The Temporal Dynamics of Opportunity Costs: A Normative Account of Cognitive Fatigue and Boredom 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.