Individualized precision targeting of dorsal attention and default mode networks with rTMS in traumatic brain injury-associated depression
Siddiqi, S. H.; Kandala, S.; Hacker, C. D.; Trapp, N. T.; Leuthardt, E. C.; Carter, A. R.; Brody, D. L.
Show abstract
BackgroundAt the group level, antidepressant efficacy of rTMS targets is inversely related to their normative connectivity with subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC). Individualized connectivity may yield better targets, particularly in patients with neuropsychiatric disorders who may have aberrant connectivity. However, sgACC connectivity shows poor test-retest reliability at the individual level. Individualized resting-state network mapping (RSNM) can reliably map inter-individual variability in brain network organization. ObjectiveTo identify individualized RSNM-based rTMS targets that reliably target the sgACC connectivity profile. MethodsWe used RSNM to identify network-based rTMS targets in 10 healthy controls and 13 individuals with traumatic brain injury-associated depression (TBI-D). These "RSNM targets" were compared with consensus structural targets and targets based on individualized anti-correlation with a group-mean-derived sgACC region ("anti-group-mean sgACC targets"). The TBI-D cohort was randomized to receive active (n=9) or sham (n=4) rTMS to RSNM targets. ResultsThe group-mean sgACC connectivity profile was reliably estimated by individualized correlation with default mode network (DMN) and anti-correlation with dorsal attention network (DAN). Individualized RSNM targets were then identified based on DAN anti-correlation and DMN correlation. Counterintuitively, anti-correlation with the group-mean sgACC connectivity profile was stronger and more reliable for RSNM-derived targets than for "anti-group-mean sgACC targets". Improvement in depression after RSNM-targeted rTMS was predicted by target anti-correlation with the portions of sgACC. Active treatment led to increased connectivity within and between several relevant regions. ConclusionsRSNM may enable reliable individualized rTMS targeting, although further research is needed to determine whether this personalized approach can improve clinical outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- tDCS modulates effective connectivity during motor command following; a potential therapeutic target for disorders of consciousness 95%
- Glutamate-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (GluCEST) Detects Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Motor Cortex 95%
- Psilocybin induces spatially constrained alterations in thalamic functional organization and connectivity 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Networks and genes modulated by posterior hypothalamic stimulation in patients with aggressive behaviours: Analysis of probabilistic mapping, normative connectomics, and atlas-derived transcriptomics of the largest international multi-centre dataset 94%
- Attention network modulation via tRNS correlates with attention gain 93%
- Dual transcranial electromagnetic stimulation of the precuneus boosts human long-term memory 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Therapeutic DBS for OCD Suppresses the Default Mode Network 95%
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Modulate fMRI Drug Cue Reactivity in Methamphetamine Users: A Randomized Clinical Trial 94%
- Identification of cortical targets for modulating function supported by the human hippocampal network 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Whole-brain Mechanism of Neurofeedback Therapy: Predictive Modeling of Neurofeedback Outcomes on Repetitive Negative Thinking in Depression 95%
- Magnetic seizure therapy and electroconvulsive therapy increase frontal aperiodic activity 94%
- A Randomised, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial of Deep Brain Stimulation of the Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis for Treatment-Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.