Transfer Entropy Based Causality From Head Motion To Eye Movement
Lv, Z.; Xu, Q.; Schoeffmann, K.; Parkinson, S.
Show abstract
Eye movement behavior, which provides the visual information acquisition and processing, plays an important role in performing sensorimotor tasks, such as driving, by human beings in everyday life. In the procedure of performing sensorimotor tasks, eye movement is contributed through a specific coordination of head and eye in gaze changes, with head motions preceding eye movements. Notably we believe that this coordination in essence indicates a kind of causality. In this paper, we investigate transfer entropy to set up a quantity for measuring an unidirectional causality from head motion to eye movement. A normalized version of the proposed measure, demonstrated by virtual reality based psychophysical studies, behaves very well as a proxy of driving performance, suggesting that quantitative exploitation of coordination of head and eye may be an effective behaviometric of sensorimotor activity.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling, Analysis, and Optimization of Three-Dimensional Restricted Visual Field Metric-Free Swarms 96%
- Simulation of foraging behavior using a decision-making agent with Bayesian and inverse Bayesian inference: Temporal correlations and power laws in displacement patterns 95%
- Projections and fractional dynamics of COVID-19 with optimal control analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Low rank approximation of difference between correlation matrices by using inner product 95%
- Investigating dynamics of COVID-19 spread and containment with agent-based modeling 94%
- Partition Quantitative Assessment (PQA): A quantitative methodology to assess the embedded noise in clustered omics and systems biology data 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.