Back

Metapopulation Structure of Diatom-associated Marine Bacteria

Qu, L.; Feng, X.; Chen, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, X.; Hu, Z.; Wang, H.; Luo, H.

2021-03-10 microbiology
10.1101/2021.03.10.434754 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Marine bacteria-phytoplankton interaction ultimately shapes ecosystem productivity. The biochemical mechanisms underlying their interactions become increasingly known, yet how these ubiquitous interactions drive bacterial evolution has not been illustrated. Here, we sequenced genomes of 294 bacterial isolates associated with 19 coexisting diatom cells. These bacteria constitute eight genetically monomorphic populations of the globally abundant Roseobacter group. Six of these populations are members of Sulfitobacter, arguably the most prevalent bacteria associated with marine diatoms. A key finding is that populations varying at the intra-specific level have been differentiated and each are either associated with a single diatom host or with multiple hosts not overlapping with those of other populations. These closely related populations further show functional differentiation; they differ in motility phenotype and they harbor distinct types of secretion systems with implication for mediating organismal interactions. This interesting host-dependent population structure is even evident for demes within a genetically monomorphic population but each associated with a distinct diatom cell, as shown by a greater similarity in genome content between isolates from the same host compared to those from different hosts. Importantly, the intra- and inter-population differentiation pattern remains when the analyses are restricted to isolates from intra-specific diatom hosts, ruling out distinct selective pressures and instead suggesting coexisting microalgal cells as physical barriers of bacterial gene flow. Taken together, microalgae-associated bacteria display a unique microscale metapopulation structure, which consists of numerous small populations whose evolution is driven by random genetic drift.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.3%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 2%
23.3%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 7%
8.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
5
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
6
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 14%
3.7%
7
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.7%
8
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
9
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.4%
10
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
12
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
13
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.5%
15
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
16
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
17
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
20
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
22
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
23
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.5%