Back

New opabiniid diversifies the weirdest wonders of the euarthropod lower stem group

Pates, S.; Wolfe, J. M.; Lerosey-Aubril, R.; Daley, A. C.; Ortega-Hernández, J.

2021-03-11 paleontology
10.1101/2021.03.10.434726 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Once considered weird wonders of the Cambrian, the emblematic Burgess Shale animals Anomalocaris and Opabinia are now recognized as lower stem-group euarthropods. Anomalocaris and its relatives (radiodonts) had a worldwide distribution and survived until at least the Devonian, whereas - despite intense study - Opabinia remains the only formally described opabiniid to date. Here we reinterpret a fossil from the Wheeler Formation of Utah as a new opabiniid, KUMIP 314087. By visualizing the sample of phylogenetic topologies in treespace, our results fortify support for the position of KUMIP 314087 beyond the nodal support traditionally applied. Our phylogenetic evidence expands opabiniids to multiple Cambrian Stages spanning approximately five million years. Our results underscore the power of treespace visualization for resolving imperfectly preserved fossils and expanding the known diversity and spatiotemporal ranges within the euarthropod lower stem group. Additional noteThis work contains a new biological name. New names in preprints are not considered available by the ICZN. To avoid ambiguity, the new biological name is not included in this preprint, and the specimen number (KUMIP 314087) is used as a placeholder. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=150 SRC="FIGDIR/small/434726v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (98K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e770aaorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@95bbd3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5e460eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1494152_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOCover image.C_FLOATNO Artistic reconstruction of the new opabiniid from the Wheeler Formation, Utah, USA (Cambrian: Drumian). Artwork by F. Anthony. C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.