Spread and sources of information and misinformation about COVID-19 early during the pandemic in a U.S. national cohort study
Westmoreland, D. A.; Berry, A.; Zimba, R.; Kulkarni, S. G.; Parcesepe, A.; Maroko, A. R.; Poehlein, E.; You, W.; Mirzayi, C.; Kochhar, S.; Robertson, M.; Waldron, L.; Grov, C.; Nash, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundEarly in the pandemic, misinformation about COVID-19 was spread on social media. The purpose of this study was to describe trusted sources of COVID-19 information and claims seen and believed about COVID-19 early in the pandemic among U.S. adults. Then, we assessed the impact of believing such claims on engaging in personal protective actions (PPA). MethodsWe used baseline data from the CHASING COVID Cohort (n = 7,070) collected March 28, 2020 to April 20, 2020 to describe trusted sources of COVID-19 information as well as claims circulating on social media that had been seen and believed. We used Poisson regression to determine the association of believing certain claims with engaging in a higher number of PPA. ResultsThe top three trusted sources of COVID-19 information were the CDC (67.9%), the WHO (53.7%), and State Health Departments (53.0%). Several COVID-19 claims circulated on social media had been seen, e.g., that the virus was created in a laboratory (54.8%). Moreover, substantial proportions of participants indicated agreement with some of these claims. In multivariable regression, we found that belief in certain claims was associated with engaging in a higher number of PPA. For example, believing that paper masks would prevent transmission of the virus was associated with engaging in a higher number of protective actions ({beta} = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.004 - 0.046). ConclusionsResults suggest the need for public health leadership on social media platforms to combat misinformation and supports social media as a tool to further public health interventions.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Who is (Not) Complying with the Social Distancing Directive and Why? Testing a General Framework of Compliance with Multiple Measures of Social Distancing 94%
- The Role of Testing Availability on Intentions to Isolate during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Trial 94%
- Key topics in pandemic health risk communication: A qualitative study of expert opinions and knowledge 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tracking private WhatsApp discourse about COVID-19: A longitudinal infodemiology study in Singapore 95%
- Abusers indoors and coronavirus outside: an examination of public discourse about COVID-19 and family violence on Twitter using machine learning 93%
- Predicting public take-up of digital contact tracing during the COVID-19 crisis: Results of a national survey 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The social media response to twice-weekly mass asymptomatic testing in England 95%
- Perceived vulnerability to COVID-19 infection from event attendance: Results from Louisiana, USA, two weeks preceding the national emergency declaration 93%
- Engagement with daily testing instead of self-isolating in contacts of confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Examining Australian's beliefs, misconceptions, and sources of information for COVID-19: A national online survey 94%
- COVID-19 risk perceptions of social interaction and essential activities and inequity in the United States: Results from a nationally representative survey 93%
- A cross-sectional study of COVID-19 knowledge, beliefs and prevention behaviors among adults in Senegal 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying Online Advice-Seekers for Recovering from Opioid Use Disorder 93%
- Knowledge and practices towards COVID-19 during its outbreak: a multinational cross-sectional study 92%
- Perceptions and willingness of patients and caregivers on the utilization of patient-generated health data: a cross-sectional survey 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.