Back

RNA-silencing induces target gene relocalization toward a specialized nuage domain

Mello, C.; Yang, Y.; Grunwald, D.; Priess, J.

2021-03-11 genetics
10.1101/2021.03.09.434681 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The authors wish to withdraw this manuscript and apologize for errors in the initial submission. All the original experiments were performed by YY. Unfortunately, JP and members of the Mello lab have not been able to replicate some aspects of the study. JP has failed to independently reproduce the specific results showing RNAi-triggered relocalization of target RNA, and P granule specific accumulation of (the P granule component GLH-1) as reported. The conditions/strains analyzed by JP were as follows: (1) oma-1 FISH on WT worms [control, 6 hr and 12 hr oma-1(RNAi)]. (2) oma-1 FISH on OMA-1:GFP worms [control, 6 hr oma-1(RNAi), or 6 hr gfp(RNAi)]. (3) oma-1 FISH on WT worms [control, 4hr, 6hr, 8 hr, and 10 hr oma-1(RNAi)]. 10-23 gonads were analyzed per experiment. Fixation conditions were essentially as described, with the only known difference being that gonads were not exposed to detergent prior to fixation. Using YYs reagents and protocol the Mello lab has not observed an obvious relocalization of target RNA to P granules (marked by GFP::GLH-1) after 6 hrs oma-1(RNAi); n=92 gonads. CM, JP and DG consider that the published images accurately represent the image stacks provided by YY as representative, raw data, but JP and CM note configurations of FISH signals in germ nuclei and gonad anatomy that they consider unusual. CM, JP and DG have not detected any evidence of image manipulation. YY states that none of the raw image data were manipulated beyond standard adjustments for brightness and contrast prior to processing images for publication as described. However, YY reports that the images were not representative of the majority of sample gonads, and instead were pre-selected under low magnification for rare examples with asymmetrical, expanded P granules. Efforts to identify conditions that explain the rare gonads imaged by YY continue in the Mello lab, as do efforts to reproduce independently each of the other reported results; we plan to provide an update in the near future.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
RNA
169 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.9%
2
STAR Protocols
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.3%
3
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
5
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
6
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
8
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
9
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
12
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.8%
16
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
19
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Chromosoma
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
21
Current Protocols
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
22
Nature Protocols
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.7%
24
RNA Biology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.5%
26
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%