Back

Limited metacognitive access to one's own facial expressions

Ciston, A. B.; Forster, C.; Brick, T. R.; Kühn, S.; Verrel, J.; Filevich, E.

2021-03-10 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.03.08.434069 bioRxiv
Show abstract

As humans we communicate important information through fine nuances in our facial expressions, but because conscious motor representations are noisy, we might not be able to report these fine but meaningful movements. Here we measured how much explicit metacognitive information young adults have about their own facial expressions. Participants imitated pictures of themselves making facial expressions and triggered a camera to take a picture of them while doing so. They then rated confidence (how well they thought they imitated each expression). We defined metacognitive access to facial expressions as the relationship between objective performance (how well the two pictures matched) and subjective confidence ratings. Metacognitive access to facial expressions was very poor when we considered all face features indiscriminately. Instead, machine learning analyses revealed that participants rated confidence based on idiosyncratic subsets of features. We conclude that metacognitive access to own facial expressions is partial, and surprisingly limited.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
25.8%
2
Communications Psychology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
Psychological Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
4
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 23%
5.3%
6
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.9%
7
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.4%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
9
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 22%
2.4%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.3%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.3%
13
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.3%
14
npj Science of Learning
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
15
Neuroscience of Consciousness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
16
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
17
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
18
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
19
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
20
Consciousness and Cognition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
22
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
23
Journal of Vision
110 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
24
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%