Comparing Interventions Aimed at Improving Influenza Vaccination Coverage Among Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol
Wu, P. C.; McPherson, L.; Lambert, S. B.; Wnukowski-Mtonga, P.; Lennox, N. G.; Ware, R. S.
Show abstract
BackgroundInfluenza is a major contributor to global disease burden. Vaccination recommendations specifically target populations at increased risk of serious influenza sequelae. The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of different quality improvement interventions to increase vaccination rates in high-risk populations. MethodsRandomized and nonrandomized studies with concurrent control groups will be identified. Interventions to increase vaccination rates will be categorized by strategy type. Overall intervention effects will be calculated using random effects models. Study quality will be assessed using a modified Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Meta-Analysis of Influenza Vaccination Following Correspondence: Considerations for COVID-19 96%
- Trends, patterns and psychological influences on COVID-19 vaccination intention: findings from a large prospective community cohort study in England and Wales (Virus Watch) 94%
- Parental attitudes towards mandatory vaccination; a systematic review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Community Engagement to support COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake: A living systematic review protocol 95%
- Attitudes towards vaccines and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: Implications for public health communications in Australia 93%
- Healthcare workers’ perceptions and attitudes towards the UK’s COVID-19 vaccination programme 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Marginalized Populations in the U.S. and Canada: Protocol for a Scoping Review 93%
- COVID-19 vaccination beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours among health and social care workers in the UK: a mixed-methods study 93%
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and refusal and associated factors in an adult population in Saskatchewan, Canada: Evidence from predictive modelling 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence-Based, Cost-Effective Interventions To Suppress The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 91%
- Community mobilisation approaches to preventing and reducing adolescent multiple risk behaviour: a realist review protocol 90%
- Quantification of the association between predisposing health conditions, demographic, and behavioural factors with hospitalisation, intensive care unit admission, and death from COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Models of COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation: a systematic literature search and narrative review 95%
- Non-pharmaceutical interventions and vaccinating school children required to contain SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant outbreaks in Australia: a modelling analysis 92%
- Describing the population experiencing COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough following second vaccination in England: A cohort study from OpenSAFELY 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.