Combinatorial patterns of gene expression changes contribute to variable expressivity of the developmental delay-associated 16p12.1 deletion
Jensen, M.; Tyryskhina, A.; Pizzo, L.; Smolen, C.; Das, M.; Huber, E.; Krishnan, A.; Girirajan, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundRecent studies have suggested that individual variants do not sufficiently explain the variable expressivity of phenotypes observed in complex disorders. For example, the 16p12.1 deletion is associated with developmental delay and neuropsychiatric features in affected individuals, but is inherited in >90% of cases from a mildly-affected parent. While children with the deletion are more likely to carry additional "second-hit" variants than their parents, the mechanisms for how these variants contribute to phenotypic variability are unknown. MethodsWe performed detailed clinical assessments, whole-genome sequencing, and RNA sequencing of lymphoblastoid cell lines for 32 individuals in five large families with multiple members carrying the 16p12.1 deletion. We identified contributions of the 16p12.1 deletion and "second-hit" variants towards a range of expression changes in deletion carriers and their family members, including differential expression, outlier expression, alternative splicing, allele-specific expression, and expression-quantitative trait loci analyses. ResultsWe found that the deletion dysregulates multiple autism and brain development genes such as FOXP1, ANK3, and MEF2. Carrier children also showed an average of 5,323 gene expression changes compared with one or both parents, which matched with 33/39 observed developmental phenotypes. We identified significant enrichments for 13/25 classes of "second-hit" variants in genes with expression changes, where 4/25 variant classes were only enriched when inherited from the non-carrier parent, including loss-of-function SNVs and large duplications. In 11 instances, including for ZEB2 and SYNJ1, gene expression was synergistically altered by both the deletion and inherited "second-hits" in carrier children. Finally, brain-specific interaction network analysis showed strong connectivity between genes carrying "second-hits" and genes with transcriptome alterations in deletion carriers. ConclusionsOur results suggest a potential mechanism for how "second-hit" variants modulate expressivity of complex disorders such as the 16p12.1 deletion through transcriptomic perturbation of gene networks important for early development. Our work further shows that family-based assessments of transcriptome data are highly relevant towards understanding the genetic mechanisms associated with complex disorders.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Human and rat skeletal muscle single-nuclei multi-omic integrative analyses nominate causal cell types, regulatory elements, and SNPs for complex traits 95%
- A general framework for identifying rare variant combinations in complex disorders 95%
- Allele-specific alternative splicing in human tissues 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic single-variant and gene-based association testing of 3,700 phenotypes in 281,850 UK Biobank exomes 96%
- Structural variation, selection, and diversification of the NPIP gene family from the human pangenome 95%
- Interaction studies of risk proteins in human induced neurons reveal convergent biology and novel mechanisms underlying autism spectrum disorders 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic analysis of genetic and phenotypic characteristics reveals antisense oligonucleotide therapy potential for one-third of neurodevelopmental disorders 95%
- Illuminating links between cis-regulators and trans-acting variants in the human prefrontal cortex 94%
- A systematic analysis of splicing variants identifies new diagnoses in the 100,000 Genomes Project. 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.