TAFKAP: An improved method for probabilistic decoding of cortical activity
van Bergen, R. S.; Jehee, J. F. M.
Show abstract
Cortical activity can be difficult to interpret. Neural responses to the same stimulus vary between presentations, due to random noise and other sources of variability. This unreliable relationship to external stimuli renders any pattern of activity open to a multitude of plausible interpretations. We have previously shown that this uncertainty in cortical stimulus representations can be characterized using a probabilistic decoding algorithm, which inverts a generative model of stimulus-evoked cortical responses. Here, we improve upon this method in two important ways, which both target the precision with which the generative model can be estimated from limited, noisy training data. We show that these improvements lead to considerably better estimation of the presented stimulus and its associated uncertainty. Estimates of the presented stimulus are recovered with an accuracy that exceeds that of standard decoding methods (SVMs), and in some cases even approaches the behavioral accuracy of human observers. Moreover, the uncertainty in the decoded probability distributions better characterizes the precision of cortical stimulus information from trial to trial.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A hierarchical Bayesian brain parcellation framework for fusion of functional imaging datasets 96%
- The Individualized Neural Tuning Model: Precise and generalizable cartography of functional architecture in individual brains 96%
- Limitations of line-scan MRI for directly measuring neural activity 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Different computations over the same inputs produce selective behavior in algorithmic brain networks 96%
- THINGS-data: A multimodal collection of large-scale datasets for investigating object representations in human brain and behavior 95%
- Evidence for Normalization as a Fundamental Operation Across the Human Visual Cortex 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.