Back

Universal gene co-expression network reveals receptor-like protein genes conferring broad-spectrum resistance in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)

Kang, W.-H.; Lee, J.; Koo, N.; Kwon, J.-S.; Park, B.; Kim, Y.-M.; Yeom, S.-I.

2021-03-05 plant biology
10.1101/2021.03.04.433825 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Receptor-like proteins (RLPs) on the plant cell surface have been implicated in immune responses and developmental processes. Although hundreds of RLP genes have been identified in plants, only a few RLPs have been functionally characterized in a limited number of plant species. Here, we identified RLPs in the pepper (Capsicum annuum) genome, and performed comparative transcriptomics coupled with the analysis of conserved gene co-expression networks (GCNs) to reveal the role of core RLP regulators in pepper-pathogen interactions. A total of 102 RNA-seq datasets of pepper plants infected with four pathogens were used to construct CaRLP-targeted GCNs (CaRLP-GCN). All resistance-responsive CaRLP-GCNs were merged to construct a universal GCN. Fourteen hub CaRLPs, tightly connected with defense related gene clusters, were identified in eight modules. Based on the CaRLP-GCNs, we experimentally tested whether hub CaRLPs in the universal GCN are involved in biotic stress response. Of the nine hub CaRLPs tested by virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS), three genes (CaRLP264, CaRLP277, and CaRLP351) showed defense suppression with less hypersensitive response (HR)-like cell death in race-specific and non-host resistance response to viruses and bacteria, respectively, and consistently enhanced susceptibility to Ralstonia solanacearum and/or Phytophthora capsici. These data suggest that key CaRLPs exhibit conserved functions in response to multiple biotic stresses and can be used for engineering of a plant with broad-spectrum resistance. Altogether, we show that generation of a universal GCN using comprehensive transcriptome datasets could provide important clues for uncovering genes involved in various biological processes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Plant
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
2
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.3%
4
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.1%
5
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
6
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.3%
8
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.9%
10
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
11
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
12
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.3%
14
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
15
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.9%
16
Journal of Integrative Plant Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
17
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
20
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
22
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
55 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
25
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%