An NCCN-IPI based immune-related gene prognostic model for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Mu, S.; Shi, D.; Ai, L.; Fan, F.; Peng, F.; Sun, C.; Hu, Y.
Show abstract
BackgroundInternational Prognostic Index (IPI) was widely used to better discriminate prognosis of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, there is a significant need to identify novel valuable biomarkers in the context of targeted therapies, such as immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy. MethodsGene expression data and clinical information of DLBCL were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets. 371 immune-related hub genes in DLBCL patients with different IPI levels were identified by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), and 8 genes were selected to construct an IPI-based immune prognostic model (IPI-IPM). Afterward, the genetic, somatic mutational and molecular profiles of IPI-IPM subgroups were analyzed, as well as the potential clinical response of ICB in different IPI-IPM subgroups. ResultsThe IPI-IPM was constructed based on the expression of CMBL, TLCD3B, SYNDIG1, ESM1, EPHA3, HUNK, PTX3 and IL12A, where high-risk patients had shorter overall survival (OS) than low-risk patients, consistent with the results in the GEO cohorts. The comprehensive results showed that high IPI-IPM risk scores were correlated with immune-related signaling pathways, high KMT2D and CD79B mutation rates, as well as up-regulation of inhibitory immune checkpoints including PD-L1, BTLA and SIGLEC7, indicating more potential response to ICB therapy. ConclusionThe IPI-IPM has independent prognostic significance for DLBCL patients, which provides an immunological perspective to elucidate the mechanisms on tumor progression, also sheds a light on developing immunotherapy for DLBCL.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Profiling tumor immune microenvironment of non-small cell lung cancer using multiplex immunofluorescence 95%
- Pseudotemporal ordering of spatial lymphoid tissue microenvironment profiles trails Unclassified DLBCL at the periphery of the follicle 94%
- A three-gene expression score for predicting clinical benefit to anti-PD-1 blockade in advanced renal cell carcinoma 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- TG468: A Text Graph Convolutional Network for Predicting Clinical Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy 93%
- Causal Modeling Reveals Cell-Cell Communication Dynamics in the Tumor Microenvironment During Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients 92%
- A universal approach for integrating super large-scale single-cell transcriptomes by exploring gene rankings 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tumor Purity-Related Genes for Predicting the Prognosis and Drug Sensitivity of DLBCL Patients 96%
- Multi-gradient Permutation Survival Analysis Identifies Mitosis and Immune Signatures Steadily Associated with Cancer Patient Prognosis 95%
- Unveiling the influence of tumor and immune signatures on immune checkpoint therapy in advanced lung cancer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mime: A flexible machine-learning framework to construct and visualize models for clinical characteristics prediction and feature selection 93%
- Finding new cancer epigenetic and genetic biomarkers from cell-free DNA by combining SALP-seq and machine learning:esophageal cancer as an example 92%
- Estimating the effect of tissue- and blood-derived cell reference matrices on deconvolving bulk transcriptomic datasets 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- ImmuCellAI: a unique method for comprehensive T-cell subsets abundance prediction and its application in cancer immunotherapy 94%
- Cancer-like fragmentomic characteristics of somatic variants in cell-free DNA 90%
- A subset of pro-inflammatory CXCL10+ LILRB2+ macrophages derives from recipient monocytes and drives renal allograft rejection 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.