Back

An NCCN-IPI based immune-related gene prognostic model for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Mu, S.; Shi, D.; Ai, L.; Fan, F.; Peng, F.; Sun, C.; Hu, Y.

2021-03-04 bioinformatics
10.1101/2021.03.03.433839 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundInternational Prognostic Index (IPI) was widely used to better discriminate prognosis of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, there is a significant need to identify novel valuable biomarkers in the context of targeted therapies, such as immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy. MethodsGene expression data and clinical information of DLBCL were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets. 371 immune-related hub genes in DLBCL patients with different IPI levels were identified by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), and 8 genes were selected to construct an IPI-based immune prognostic model (IPI-IPM). Afterward, the genetic, somatic mutational and molecular profiles of IPI-IPM subgroups were analyzed, as well as the potential clinical response of ICB in different IPI-IPM subgroups. ResultsThe IPI-IPM was constructed based on the expression of CMBL, TLCD3B, SYNDIG1, ESM1, EPHA3, HUNK, PTX3 and IL12A, where high-risk patients had shorter overall survival (OS) than low-risk patients, consistent with the results in the GEO cohorts. The comprehensive results showed that high IPI-IPM risk scores were correlated with immune-related signaling pathways, high KMT2D and CD79B mutation rates, as well as up-regulation of inhibitory immune checkpoints including PD-L1, BTLA and SIGLEC7, indicating more potential response to ICB therapy. ConclusionThe IPI-IPM has independent prognostic significance for DLBCL patients, which provides an immunological perspective to elucidate the mechanisms on tumor progression, also sheds a light on developing immunotherapy for DLBCL.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.