COVID-19 test positivity: predictive value of various symptoms in a large community-based testing program in California
Miller, D. P.; Morrow, S.; Califf, R. M.; Kaiser, C.; Kapur, R.; Starsiak, C.; Mega, J.; Marks, W. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundMuch of the early data on COVID-19 symptomatology was captured in the hospital setting. In a community setting the symptoms most predictive of SARS-CoV-2 positivity may be different. Data from the California sites of a COVID-19 community testing program are presented here. MethodsPrior to being tested, participants in the Baseline COVID-19 Testing Program completed an online screener, in which they self-reported basic demographics and the presence or absence of 10 symptoms. Both positive and negative COVID-19 RT-PCR tests were linked back to the screener data. A multivariable model of positivity was fit using generalized estimating equations, adjusting for month of testing as a fixed effect and accounting for clustering of data within each test site. ResultsAmong 547,018 first-time tests in California in 2020, positivity rates were 3.4%, 9.9%, and 19.8% for participants with no symptoms, 1 symptom, or 2 or more symptoms at the time of screening, respectively. All ten symptoms were individually associated with higher positivity rates, but only six of ten symptoms were associated with higher positivity when adjusting for other symptoms. Major symptoms with highest predictive value were recent loss of taste or smell, fever, and coughing with ORs of 3.27, 1.97, and 1.95, respectively. Shortness of breath and vomiting or diarrhea were negatively associated with positivity adjusting for other symptoms and, absent other symptoms, participants with these symptoms did not have significantly higher positivity rates than asymptomatic participants. ConclusionsRecent loss of taste and smell should be elevated to a major symptom along with fever and coughing in public health messaging and in our community approach to testing and surveillance, while mild to moderate shortness of breath should be de-emphasized as a sensitive early predictor of COVID-19 positivity.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic Value of Symptoms for Pediatric SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Primary Care Setting 93%
- The association between prolonged SARS-CoV-2 symptoms and work outcomes 93%
- Clinical evaluation of the Diagnostic Analyzer for Selective Hybridization (DASH): a point-of-care PCR test for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lessons Learned From the Implementation of a Participant-Collected, Mail-Based SARS-CoV-2 Serological Survey in Massachusetts, USA 93%
- Engagement with daily testing instead of self-isolating in contacts of confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 92%
- Feasibility and effectiveness of daily temperature screening to detect COVID-19 in a large public university setting 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Select Symptoms and Conditions 31 to 150 Days After Testing among Children and Adults 94%
- Antibody seroprevalence and rate of asymptomatic infections with SARS-CoV-2 in Austrian hospital personnel 92%
- Duration of SARS-CoV-2 Sero-Positivity in a Large Longitudinal Sero-Surveillance Cohort: The COVID-19 Community Research Partnership 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Data driven phenotyping and COVID-19 case definitions: a pattern recognition approach 92%
- Experience of the COVID-19 pandemic in rural Odisha, India: knowledge, preventative actions, and impacts on daily life 91%
- Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM antibodies among Danish and Swedish Falck emergency and non-emergency healthcare workers 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of Repeat BinaxNOW SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Testing in a Community Setting, Wisconsin, November-December 2020 95%
- Predictive value of isolated symptoms for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children tested during peak circulation of the delta variant 94%
- Population-based estimates of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) prevalence and characteristics: A cross-sectional study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.