Back

Compositional analysis of ALS-linked stress granule-like structures reveals factors and cellular pathways dysregulated by mutant FUS under stress

An, H.; Litscher, G.; Wei, W.; Watanabe, N.; Hashimoto, T.; Iwatsubo, T.; Buchman, V. L.; Shelkovnikova, T. A.

2021-03-02 cell biology
10.1101/2021.03.02.433611 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Formation of cytoplasmic RNA-protein structures called stress granules (SGs) is a highly conserved cellular response to stress. Abnormal metabolism of SGs may contribute to the pathogenesis of (neuro)degenerative diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Many SG proteins are affected by mutations causative of these conditions, including fused in sarcoma (FUS). Mutant FUS variants have high affinity to SGs and also spontaneously form de novo cytoplasmic RNA granules. Mutant FUS-containing assemblies (mFAs), often called "pathological SGs", are proposed to play a role in ALS-FUS pathogenesis. However, global structural differences between mFAs and physiological SGs remain largely unknown, therefore it is unclear whether and how mFAs may affect cellular stress responses. Here we used affinity purification to characterise the protein and RNA composition of normal SGs and mFAs purified from stressed cells. Comparison of the SG and mFA proteomes revealed that proteasome subunits and certain nucleocytoplasmic transport factors are depleted from mFAs, whereas translation elongation, mRNA surveillance and splicing factors as well as mitochondrial proteins are enriched in mFAs, as compared to SGs. Validation experiments for a hit from our analysis, a splicing factor hnRNPA3, confirmed its RNA-dependent sequestration into mFAs in cells and into pathological FUS inclusions in a FUS transgenic mouse model. Furthermore, silencing of the Drosophila hnRNPA3 ortholog dramatically enhanced FUS toxicity in transgenic flies. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of SGs and mFAs revealed that mFAs recruit a significantly less diverse spectrum of RNAs, including reduced recruitment of transcripts encoding proteins involved in protein translation, DNA damage response, and apoptotic signalling. However mFAs abnormally sequester certain mRNAs encoding proteins involved in stress signalling cascades. Overall, our study establishes molecular differences between physiological SGs and mFAs and identifies the spectrum of proteins, RNAs and respective cellular pathways affected by mFAs in stressed cells. In conclusion, we show that mFAs are compositionally distinct from SGs and that they cannot fully substitute for SG functions while gaining novel, potentially toxic functions in cellular stress response. Results of our study support a pathogenic role for stress-induced cytoplasmic FUS assemblies in ALS-FUS.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.4%
2
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.2%
3
EMBO Reports
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.0%
5
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 13%
4.0%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
4.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
8
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
9
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
10
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.1%
12
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
13
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
14
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
15
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
16
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
17
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
18
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
19
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
20
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.5%
22
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
23
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
24
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
25
Cell Stress and Chaperones
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
26
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
27
Molecular and Cellular Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
28
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
30
RNA
169 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%