Multi-scale hierarchical neural network models that bridge from single neurons in the primate primary visual cortex to object recognition behavior
Marques, T.; Schrimpf, M.; DiCarlo, J. J.
Show abstract
Primate visual object recognition relies on the representations in cortical areas at the top of the ventral stream that are computed by a complex, hierarchical network of neural populations. While recent work has created reasonably accurate image-computable hierarchical neural network models of those neural stages, those models do not yet bridge between the properties of individual neurons and the overall emergent behavior of the ventral stream. One reason we cannot yet do this is that individual artificial neurons in multi-stage models have not been shown to be functionally similar to individual biological neurons. Here, we took an important first step by building and evaluating hundreds of hierarchical neural network models in how well their artificial single neurons approximate macaque primary visual cortical (V1) neurons. We found that single neurons in certain models are surprisingly similar to their biological counterparts and that the distributions of single neuron properties, such as those related to orientation and spatial frequency tuning, approximately match those in macaque V1. Critically, we observed that hierarchical models with V1 stages that better match macaque V1 at the single neuron level are also more aligned with human object recognition behavior. Finally, we show that an optimized classical neuroscientific model of V1 is more functionally similar to primate V1 than all of the tested multi-stage models, suggesting room for further model improvements with tangible payoffs in closer alignment to human behavior. These results provide the first multi-stage, multi-scale models that allow our field to ask precisely how the specific properties of individual V1 neurons relate to recognition behavior. HighlightsO_LIImage-computable hierarchical neural network models can be naturally extended to create hierarchical "brain models" that allow direct comparison with biological neural networks at multiple scales - from single neurons, to population of neurons, to behavior. C_LIO_LISingle neurons in some of these hierarchical brain models are functionally similar to single neurons in macaque primate visual cortex (V1) C_LIO_LISome hierarchical brain models have processing stages in which the entire distribution of artificial neuron properties closely matches the biological distributions of those same properties in macaque V1 C_LIO_LIHierarchical brain models whose V1 processing stages better match the macaque V1 stage also tend to be more aligned with human object recognition behavior at their output stage C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating receptive fields of simple and complex cells in early visual cortex: A convolutional neural network model with parameterized rectification 96%
- Learning Divisive Normalization in Primary Visual Cortex 96%
- High-performing neural network models of visual cortex benefit from high latent dimensionality 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gain, not concomitant changes in spatial receptive field properties, improves task performance in a neural network attention model 96%
- The Development of Active Binocular Vision under Normal and Alternate Rearing Conditions 95%
- A general decoding strategy explains the relationship between behavior and correlated variability 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A systematic analysis of the joint effects of ganglion cells, lagged LGN cells, and intercortical inhibition on spatiotemporal processing and direction selectivity 95%
- Contrast Sensitivity Function in Deep Networks 95%
- Learning to segment self-generated from externally caused optic flow through sensorimotor mismatch circuits 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.