Spontaneous neural oscillations influence behavior and sensory representations by suppressing neuronal excitability
Iemi, L.; Gwilliams, L.; Samaha, J.; Auksztulewicz, R.; Cycowicz, Y. M.; King, J.-R.; Nikulin, V. V.; Thesen, T.; Doyle, W.; Devinsky, O.; Schroeder, C. E.; Melloni, L.; Haegens, S.
Show abstract
The ability to process and respond to external input is critical for adaptive behavior. Why, then, do neural and behavioral responses vary across repeated presentations of the same sensory input? Spontaneous fluctuations of neuronal excitability are currently hypothesized to underlie the trial-by-trial variability in sensory processing. To test this, we capitalized on invasive electrophysiology in neurosurgical patients performing an auditory discrimination task with visual cues: specifically, we examined the interaction between prestimulus alpha oscillations, excitability, task performance, and decoded neural stimulus representations. We found that strong prestimulus oscillations in the alpha+ band (i.e., alpha and neighboring frequencies), rather than the aperiodic signal, correlated with a low excitability state, indexed by reduced broadband high-frequency activity. This state was related to slower reaction times and reduced neural stimulus encoding strength. We propose that the alpha+ rhythm modulates excitability, thereby resulting in variability in behavior and sensory representations despite identical input.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Coupling of pupil- and neuronal population dynamics reveals diverse influences of arousal on cortical processing 97%
- Neural interactions in the human frontal cortex dissociate reward and punishment learning 96%
- Spontaneous Neuronal Oscillations in the Human Insula are Hierarchically Organized Traveling Waves 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.