Back

Recent changes in COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Healthcare Workers

OBrien, E. C.; Xu, H.; Cohen, L. W.; Shenkman, E. A.; Rothman, R. L.; Forrest, C. B.; Hernandez, A. F.

2021-03-03 public and global health
10.1101/2021.03.01.21252457 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionEarly COVID-19 vaccine acceptance rates suggest that up to one-third of HCWs may be vaccine-hesitant. However, it is unclear whether hesitancy among HCWs has improved with time and if there are temporal changes whether these differ by healthcare worker role. MethodsIn October 2020, a brief survey was sent to all participants in the Healthcare Worker Exposure Response and Outcomes (HERO) Registry with a yes/no question regarding vaccination under emergency use authorization (EUA): "If an FDA emergency use-approved vaccine to prevent coronavirus/COVID-19 was available right now at no cost, would you agree to be vaccinated?" The poll was repeated in December 2020, with the same question sent to all registry participants. Willingness was defined as a "Yes" response, and hesitancy was defined as a "No" response. Participants were stratified into clinical care roles. Baseline demographics of survey respondents at each timepoint were compared using appropriate univariate statistics (chi-squared and t-tests). Analyses were descriptive, with frequencies and percentages reported for each category. ResultsOf 4882 HERO active registry participants during September 1 - October 31, 2020, 2070 (42.4%) completed the October survey, and n=1541 (31.6%) completed the December survey. 70.2% and 67.7% who were in clinical care roles, respectively. In October, 54.2% of HCWs in clinical roles said they would take an EUA-approved vaccine, which increased to 76.2% in December. The largest gain in vaccine willingness was observed among physicians, 64.0% of whom said they would take a vaccine in October, compared with 90.5% in December. Nurses were the least likely to report that they would take a vaccine in both October (46.6%) and December (66.9%). We saw no statistically significant differences in age, race/ethnicity, gender, or medical role between time points. When restricting to the 998 participants who participated at both time points, 69% were vaccine-willing at both time points; 15% were hesitant at both time points, 13% who were hesitant in October were willing in December; and 2.9% who were willing in October were hesitant in December. ConclusionsIn a set of cross-sectional surveys of vaccine acceptance among healthcare workers, willingness improved substantially over 2 calendar months during which the US had a presidential election and two vaccine manufacturers released top-line Phase 3 trial results. While improved willingness was observed in all role categories, nurses reported the most vaccine hesitancy at both time points.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.4%
2
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.9%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.2%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.7%
5
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
6
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
8
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.2%
9
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
12
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
13
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
14
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
15
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
18
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Vaccine: X
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
22
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
26
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
28
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%