When thinking you are better leads to feeling worse: Self-other asymmetries in prosocial behavior and increased anxiety during the Covid-19 pandemic
Helion, C.; Smith, D. V.; Jarcho, J.
Show abstract
Self-favoring beliefs (e.g., that one tends to perform better than peers) are generally associated with positive psychological outcomes like increased self-esteem and resilience. However, this tendency may be problematic in the context of collective action problems, wherein individuals are reliant on others pro-social behaviors to achieve larger goals. We examined this question in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic, and recruited participants (n = 1023) from a university community in Spring 2020. We found evidence for a self-peer asymmetry, such that participants reported that they were doing more to stop the spread of the disease and were more pro-socially motivated than peers. Actual peer reports indicated that these were overestimations. This self-enhancement tendency comes with a cost: the perceived self-peer asymmetry mediated the relationship between Covid-specific worry and general anxiety during the early lockdown period. This indicates that while believing one is doing more than others may be maladaptive in collective action problems.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Who is (Not) Complying with the Social Distancing Directive and Why? Testing a General Framework of Compliance with Multiple Measures of Social Distancing 95%
- Why the COVID-19 pandemic is a traumatic stressor 94%
- Integrating Operant and Cognitive Behavioral Economics to Inform Infectious Disease Response: Prevention, Testing, and Vaccination in the COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Depression and loneliness during COVID-19 restrictions in the United States, and their associations with frequency of social and sexual connections 93%
- How is the distribution of psychological distress changing over time? Who is driving these changes? Analysis of the 1958 and 1970 British birth cohorts 92%
- Heterogeneity and heterotypic continuity of emotional and behavioral profiles across development 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-beneficial belief updating as a coping mechanism for stress-induced negative affect 92%
- Loneliness and diurnal cortisol levels during COVID-19 lockdown: the roles of living situation, relationship status and relationship quality 92%
- Heterogeneous Mental Health Development During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Kingdom 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.