Study protocol for an inception cohort investigating possible predictors of systemic steroids effectiveness in treatment of acute sciatic pain
Porceban, G. H.; Ueta, R. H. S.; Belloti, J. C.; Neto, C. A. C.; Filho, A. F.; Vieira, F. A.; Puertas, E. B.; Tamaoki, M. J. S.
Show abstract
IntroductionSciatic pain secondary to nerve root compression occurs in approximately 1% of the general population in the United States, which represents enormous costs related to the treatment and loss of function of symptomatic individuals. Acute radicular pain is predominantly caused by herniation of the intervertebral disc but can also be caused by degenerative changes. Compressive and inflammatory mechanical factors are interrelated in the pathophysiology of symptoms. Although radiculopathy is self-limited in most cases, in its acute stage it is associated with painful symptoms and loss of essential function. The first-line treatment usually employed is a conservative approach, including a short rest period and use of common analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. As an alternative to the conservative approach, the systemic administration of oral corticosteroids, such as prednisone, are widely used. However, the current literature shows contradictory results for this treatment in terms of improvement of pain and function. The present study hypothesizes that treatment with prednisone is effective in the treatment of acute sciatic pain in patients with social, clinical, and demographic characteristics favorable to this treatment. Objectivesthe main objective of the present study is to identify predictors, both clinical and imaging, of a positive response, in terms of both function and pain intensity, to prednisone treatment in patients with acute sciatic pain. Methods and analysisthe present study will include a cohort of patients, with a diagnosis of acute sciatica, who will receive treatment with oral prednisone. The pain and functional scores before and after treatment will be compared. Thereafter, the social, clinical, and radiographic characteristics of responsive patients will be compared to those of patients who did not respond well to the treatment. Ethics and disseminationthe study received the approval of Federal University of Sao Paulo Research Committee (4.232.193) and Research Ethics National Committee (CONEP). ARTICLE SUMMARYStrengths and limitations of this study O_LIThe study is based on samples from a large population recruited from a reference facility for the treatment of acute sciatic pain. C_LIO_LIThere is potential for optimization of treatment response with oral corticosteroids. C_LIO_LIThe study will be conducted with a population with defined clinical characteristics. C_LIO_LIDue to the relatively short follow-up period, the project will not evaluate alternative treatments, such as surgery. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Effects of Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on Postoperative Recovery in Elderly Patients with Hip fracture: a study protocol for randomized, parallel controlled, double-blind trial 95%
- Predicting pain and function outcomes in people consulting with shoulder pain: The PANDA-S clinical cohort and qualitative study protocol (ISRCTN 46948079) 95%
- Guided relaxation-based virtual reality versus distraction-based virtual reality or passive control for postoperative pain management in children and adolescents undergoing Nuss repair of pectus excavatum: protocol for a prospective, randomized, controlled trial (FOREVR Peds trial) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can a specific biobehavioral based therapeutic education program lead to changes in pain perception and brain plasticity biomarkers in chronic pain patients? A study protocol for a randomized clinical trial 95%
- The perception of individuals with low back pain regarding reassuring information: insights based on physiotherapists messages 95%
- A case-control study evaluating CT signs of xiphoid process associated with xiphodynia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of Operative Time and Blood Loss with the FFX(R) Device Versus Pedicle Screw Fixation During Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study 93%
- Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Ultrasound Therapy for Plantar Fasciitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 92%
- Comparison of Efficacy of Dexamethasone and Methylprednisolone in Improving the Partial Pressure of Arterial Oxygen and Fraction of Inspired Oxygen Ratio among COVID-19 Patients 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characteristics of patients with myofascial pain syndrome of the low back 96%
- Chronic Low Back Pain Patient Satisfaction with Lumbar Steroid Injection: a Data-Driven Analysis 95%
- Immediate effect of osteopathic techniques on human resting muscle tone in healthy subjects using myotonometry: A factorial randomized trial 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in back pain scores after bariatric surgery in obese patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Does Time to Theatre Affect The Ability to Achieve Fracture Reduction in Tibial Plateau Fractures? 93%
- Rehabilitation with and without Robot and Allied Digital Technologies (RADTs) in stroke patients: a study protocol for a multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial on the effectiveness, acceptability, usability, and economic-organizational sustainability of RADTs from subacute to chronic phase (STROKEFIT4) 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.