Back

Can we harness digital technologies and physiology to hasten genetic gain in U.S. maize breeding?

Diepenbrock, C. H.; Tang, T.; Jines, M.; Technow, F.; Lira, S.; Podlich, D.; Cooper, M.; Messina, C. D.

2021-02-25 plant biology
10.1101/2021.02.23.432477 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genetic gain in breeding programs depends on the predictive skill of genotype-to-phenotype algorithms and precision of phenotyping, both integrated with well-defined breeding objectives for a target population of environments (TPE). The integration of physiology and genomics could improve predictive skill by capturing additive and non-additive interaction effects of genotype (G), environment (E), and management (M). Precision phenotyping at managed stress environments (MSEs) can elicit physiological expression of processes that differentiate germplasm for performance in target environments, thus enabling algorithm training. Gap analysis methodology enables design of GxM technologies for target environments by assessing the difference between current and attainable yields within physiological limits. Harnessing digital technologies such as crop growth model-whole genome prediction (CGM-WGP) and gap analysis, and MSEs, can hasten genetic gain by improving predictive skill and definition of breeding goals in the U.S. maize production TPE. A half-diallel maize experiment resulting from crossing 9 elite maize inbreds was conducted at 17 locations in the TPE and 6 locations at MSEs between 2017 and 2019. Analyses over 35 families represented by 2367 hybrids demonstrated that CGM-WGP offered a predictive advantage (y) compared to WGP that increased with occurrence of drought as measured by decreasing whole-season evapotranspiration (ET; log(y) = 0.80({+/-}0.6) - 0.006({+/-}0.001) x ET; r2 = 0.59; df = 21). Predictions of unobserved physiological traits using the CGM, akin to digital phenotyping, were stable. This understanding of germplasm response to ET enables predictive design of opportunities to close productivity gaps. We conclude that enabling physiology through digital methods can hasten genetic gain by improving predictive skill and defining breeding objectives bounded by physiological realities.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
14.0%
2
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
3
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
4
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.1%
6
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
7
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
8
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
10
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.6%
12
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
13
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
15
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
17
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
20
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
21
Physiologia Plantarum
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
23
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
26
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
27
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%