Genetic incompatibilities do not snowball in a demographic model of speciation
Maya-Lastra, C. A.; Eaton, D. A. R.
Show abstract
Two populations evolving in isolation can accumulate genetic differences over time that cause incompatibilities in their hybrid offspring. These "Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities" (DMIs) are predicted to accumulate at a rate faster than linear as the number of incompatible gene interactions "snowballs". Here we show that this snowball prediction is an artifact of two unrealistic modeling assumptions that stem from ignoring demography. We introduce a new alternative "demographic speciation model" in which the rate of DMI accumulation between populations is affected by the efficiency of purifying selection to remove incompatibilities that arise within populations. This model yields new testable predictions for understanding the tempo and mode of speciation based on population demographic parameters. A large-scale empirical analysis of bird and mammal datasets supports a unique prediction of our model: a negative relationship between effective population sizes and speciation rates. Our results challenge views of the snowball theory, and of ecological speciation models rooted in positive selection, showing instead that purifying selection may play a major role in mediating speciation rates.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sexually antagonistic coevolution between the sex chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster 97%
- Interspecific transfer of genetic information through polyploid bridges 97%
- Changes in life history and population size can explain relative neutral diversity levels on X and autosomes in extant human populations 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular signatures of resource competition: clonal interference favors ecological diversification and can lead to incipient speciation 96%
- Recombination and selection against introgressed DNA 96%
- Insights from Fisher's geometric model on the likelihood of speciation under different histories of environmental change 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.