Evaluation of COVID-19 as a risk factor for maternal-fetal and neonatal complications: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies.
Bezerra, P.; Nogueira, F. G. d. S. B.; dos Santos, A. C.; Lima, A. K. S.; Ribeiro, D. E.; Barbosa, E. A. S.; dos Santos, S. C.; de Carvalho, C. C.
Show abstract
BackgroundCOVID-19 in pregnant women has been suggested to impair maternal-fetal and neonatal outcomes. We then designed the present systematic review with meta-analysis to evaluate the repercussion of such disease over maternal fetal and neonatal mortality, need for intensive care, way of delivery, premature delivery, birth weight, Apgar score, presence of intrauterine growth restriction (IGR), and presence of amniotic fluid change. MethodsWe will conduct a computerized search through MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS/BIREME, Web of science, Biorxiv, Medrxiv, and Embase on July 23, 2020. We will include cohort and case-control studies fully reported comparing pregnant women with COVID-19 with those not affected by the disease for maternal fetal and neonatal mortality, need for intensive care, way of delivery, premature delivery occurrence, birth weight, Apgar scores, presence of intrauterine growth restriction, and presence of amniotic fluid change. Three doubles of reviewers will perform in duplicate and independently all steps on screening, risk of bias judgments, and data extraction with ability to discuss disagreements with supervising authors. Pooled effects will be estimated by both fixed and random-effects models and presented according to qualitative and quantitative heterogeneity assessment. Sensitivity analyses will be performed as well as a priori subgroup, meta-regression and multiple meta-regression analyses. Well also evaluate the risk of selective publication by assessing funnel plot asymmetry and the quality of the evidence by the application of the GRADE recommendations. DiscussionThis systematic review with meta-analysis aims to assess the repercussion of COVID-19 in pregnant women over maternal-fetal and neonatal outcomes and to help clinicians and health systems improve such population outcomes throughout the current pandemic. Systematic review registrationThis review protocol was also submitted to PROSPERO registration on February 9, 2021.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Neonatal outcomes and indirect consequences following maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy: A systematic review 96%
- Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for postpartum hypogalactia: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Comparison of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 Studies: Discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 and pregnancy: An umbrella review of clinical presentation, vertical transmission, and maternal and perinatal outcomes 97%
- Protocol for a sequential, prospective meta-analysis to describe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the pregnancy and postpartum periods 96%
- Laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infection triggers for acute myocardial infarction and stroke: systematic review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Corticosteroids for improving patient relevant outcomes in HELLP syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- The prevalence of mental ill-health in women during pregnancy and after childbirth during the Covid-19 pandemic: a Systematic review and Meta-analysis 94%
- Reduction in Spontaneous and Iatrogenic Preterm Births in Twin Pregnancies During COVID-19 Lockdown in Melbourne, Australia: A Multicenter Cohort Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Proton pump inhibitors use and risk of preeclampsia 95%
- A Call For Better Methodological Quality Of Reviews On Using Artificial Intelligence For COVID-19 Detection In Medical Imaging – An Umbrella Systematic Review 93%
- Early Outpatient Treatment Of COVID-19: A Retrospective Analysis Of 392 Cases In Italy 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and risk of preterm birth: a collaboration using large routine health datasets 92%
- Tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis (ROB-MEN): elaboration and examples 91%
- Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.