Back

Hydroxychloroquine for SARS-CoV-2 positive patients quarantined at home: The first interim analysis of a remotely conducted randomized clinical trial

Amaravadi, R.; Giles, L.; Carberry, M.; Hyman, M. C.; Frank, I.; Nasta, S.; Walsh, J.; Wileyto, E. P.; Gimotty, P.; Milone, M.; Teng, E.; Vyas, N.; Balian, S.; Kolansky, J.; Abdulhay, N.; Mcgovern, S.; Gamblin, S.; Doran, O.; Callahan, P.; Abella, B.

2021-02-26 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.02.22.21252228 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundOlder patients are at risk of increased morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 disease due to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). There are few effective treatments for outpatients with COVID-19. ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine to reduce time in quarantine for symptomatic [≥]40 years-old COVID-19 patients. DesignA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. SettingOutpatients with polymerase chain reaction confirmed COVID-19 at a University of Pennsylvania affiliated testing center between April 15, 2020 and, July 14, 2020. ParticipantsOut of 5511 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients, 1072 met initial eligibility criteria for telephone-based recruitment, but only 34 subjects were able to be randomized. InterventionsHydroxychloroquine 400 mg per twice daily (n=17) or matching placebo (n=17), taken orally for up to 14 days. MeasurementsThe primary outcome was the time to release from quarantine. Secondary outcomes included the participant-reported secondary infection of co-inhabitants, hospitalization, treatment-related adverse events, time to symptom improvement, and incidence of cardiac arrhythmia. ResultsThe median time to release from quarantine for HCQ-treated vs. placebo-treated participants was 8 days (range 4-19 days) vs. 11 days (4-18 days); z-score +0.58, p=n.s. This did not meet the pre-specified criteria for early termination, however, this study was terminated early due to lack of feasibility. There was no mortality in either study arm. LimitationSince this study was terminated early due to a lack of feasibility, no conclusion can be made about the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19 patients 40 years of age or older quarantined at home. ConclusionThe design of this remotely conducted study could guide testing of other more promising agents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04329923

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
3
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
6
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.9%
7
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.3%
10
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
11
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
16
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
18
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
19
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
20
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
21
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
22
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%