Lower respiratory tract sampling via bronchoscopy in COVID-19 ARDS - A focus on microbiology, cellular morphology, cytology and management impact
Bansal, S.; Kalpakam, H.; Kumar, A.; Varshaa, A.; Thorbole, A.; Mehta, R. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundLower respiratory tract (LRT) sampling via bronchoscopy has been done sparingly in COVID-19 ARDS due to the high aerosol risk for the health care workers (HCW). Valuable information can be gained by detailed evaluation of bronchoscopic LRT samples. MethodsLRT samples were obtained by bedside bronchoscopy performed in suspected or confirmed severe COVID-19 ARDS patients on mechanical ventilation. Only positive cases were included in the study. Microbiological, cellular and cytological studies including LRT COVID-19 RT-PCR were performed and analysed. Results100 samples were collected from 63 patients, 53 were males (84%). 43 patients (68%) had at least 1 comorbidity. 55% cases had secondary bacterial infection as demonstrated by positive culture. Most of these infections were due to multi-drug resistant organisms (94.5%). The most common organisms were Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumanii in 56.3% and 14.5% cases respectively. Fungal superinfection was observed in 9 patients (14.3%). Bronchoscopy helped confirm COVID-19 diagnosis in 1 patient and helped rule out COVID-19 in 3 patients who were eventually excluded from the study. The median BAL fluid (BALF) WBC count was 953 (IQR; 400-2717), with mean neutrophil count 85.2% ({+/-}13.9), and mean lymphocyte count 14.8% ({+/-}13.9). Repeat sampling done in some patients showed a progressive increase in the total WBC count in BALF, an increase in neutrophil percentage, and a higher chance of isolating an organism on the culture (81% repeat procedures were culture positive). The rate of super-infection increased with longer duration of illness. Patients with superinfection also had an increased WBC count (1001 vs 400), and lower lymphocyte percentage (19% vs 12% - OR - 6.8 [95%CI -14.3 - 0.7]). Bronchoscopic LRT sampling contributed significantly to modifying antibiotic coverage and discontinuing steroids in 37% cases. ConclusionThis study describes a detailed analysis of bronchoscopic LRT sampling in critically ill COVID-19 patients. This provided important basic and applied information augmenting disease understanding and contributing to clinical management when there was scant information available in the pandemic.
Matching journals
The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-drug resistance bacteria predict mortality in blood stream infection in a tertiary setting in Tanzania 95%
- Two original observations concerning bacterial infections in COVID-19 patients hospitalized in intensive care units during the first wave of the epidemic in France 94%
- Epidemiology of Respiratory Viruses in Acute Respiratory Illnesses in Malaysia: Patterns, Seasonality and Age Distribution 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of flow cytometry for cell count and detection of bacteria in biological fluids. 93%
- Distribution, Prevalence of Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria in Hainan Island and Antibiotic Resistance of Mycobacterium abscessus 93%
- Evaluating the feasibility, sensitivity, and specificity of next-generation molecular methods for pleural infection diagnosis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antibiotic Use and Outcomes in Young Children Hospitalized with Uncomplicated Community-Acquired Pneumonia 95%
- Diagnostic utility of a Ferritin-to-Procalcitonin Ratio to differentiate patients with COVID-19 from those with Bacterial Pneumonia: A multicenter study 94%
- Prolonged low-dose methylprednisolone in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antibiotic De-escalation Patterns and Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with Suspected Pneumonia as Informed by Bronchoalveolar Lavage Results 94%
- The Unyvero Hospital-Acquired pneumonia panel for diagnosis of secondary bacterial pneumonia in COVID-19 patients 94%
- Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in children: accuracy of nasopharyngeal swab compared to nasopharyngeal aspirate. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Features and Predictors for Patients with Severe SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia: a retrospective multicenter cohort study 92%
- Correlation Analysis Between Disease Severity and Inflammation-related Parameters in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia 92%
- Determinants of Developing Symptomatic Disease in Ethiopian COVID-19 Patients 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.