Back

The possible fidelity-speed-proofreading cost trade-offs in DNA replication due to the exonuclease proofreading

Li, Q.; Shu, Y.; Fu, W.; Ouyang, Z.; Li, M.

2021-02-19 biophysics
10.1101/2021.02.18.431768 bioRxiv
Show abstract

DNA replication is a high-fidelity information-copying processes which is realized by DNA polymerase (DNAP). The high fidelity was explained on the basis of the well-known kinetic-proofreading mechanism (KPR), under which the so-called fidelity-speed trade-off was studied theoretically. However, numerous biochemical experiments have shown that the high fidelity of DNA replication is achieved due to the initial discrimination of polymerase domain of DNAP, as well as the proofreading of the exonuclease domain of DNAP. This exonuclease-proofreading mechanism (EPR) is totally different from KPR. So the trade-off issues are worth being re-examined under EPR. In this paper, we use the first-passage method recently proposed by us to discuss the possible trade-offs in DNA replication under EPR. We show that there could be no fidelity-speed trade-off under EPR, i.e., the fidelity and the speed can be simultaneously enhanced by EPR in a large range of kinetic parameters. This provides a new perspective to understand the experimental data of the exonuclease activity of T7 DNAP and T4 DNAP. We also show that there exists the fidelity-proofreading cost trade-off, i.e., the fidelity is enhanced at the cost of increasing the futile hydrolysis of dNTP. A possible way to avoid this trade-off is to regulate the rate of DNAP translocation: slowing down the forward translocation (in the presence of the terminal mismatch) can enhance the fidelity without changing the speed and the proofreading cost. Our theoretical analysis offers deeper insights on the kinetics-function relation of DNAP. PACS numbers: 82.39.-k, 87.15.Rn, 87.16.A-

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
2
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
4
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
4.0%
6
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
7
Biosystems
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Biophysics and Physicobiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
Entropy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
10
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
11
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
12
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
13
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
Cognitive Neurodynamics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
17
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
19
Quantitative Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
20
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
22
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
24
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
25
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
27
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
28
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
30
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%