The Effect of NFL and NCAA Football Games on the Spread of COVID-19 in the United States: An Empirical Analysis
Toumi, A.; Zhao, H.; Chhatwal, J.; Linas, B. P.; Ayer, T.
Show abstract
ImportanceIn 2020 and early 2021, the National Football League (NFL) and National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) had opted to host games in stadiums across the country. The in-person attendance of games has varied with time and from county to county. There is currently no evidence on whether limited in-person attendance of games has caused a substantial increase in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. ObjectiveTo assess whether NFL and NCAA football games with limited in-person attendance have contributed to a substantial increase in COVID-19 cases in the counties they were held. DesignIn this time-series cross-sectional study, we matched every county hosting game(s) with in-person attendance (treated) in 2020 and 2021 with a county that has an identical game history for up to 14 days (control). We employed a standard matching method to further refine this matched set so that the treated and matched control counties have similar population size, non-pharmaceutical intervention(s) in place, and COVID-19 trends. We assessed the effect of hosting games with in-person attendance using a difference-in-difference estimator. SettingU.S. counties. ParticipantsU.S. counties hosting NFL and/or NCAA games. ExposureHosting NFL and/or NCAA games. Main outcomes and measuresEstimating the impact of NFL and NCAA games with in-person attendance on new, reported COVID-19 cases per 100,000 residents at the county-level up to 14 days post-game. ResultsThe matching algorithm returned 361 matching sets of counties. The effect of in-person attendance at NFL and NCAA games on community COVID-19 spread is not significant as it did not surpass 5 new daily cases of COVID-19 per 100,000 residents on average. Conclusions and relevanceThis time-series, cross-sectional matching study with a difference-in-differences design did not find an increase in COVID-19 cases per 100,000 residents in the counties where NFL and NCAA games were held with in-person attendance. Our study suggests that NFL and NCAA football games hosted with limited in-person attendance do not cause a significant increase in local COVID-19 cases. Key pointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSDid NFL and NCAA football games with limited in-person attendance cause a substantia increase in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases in the U.S. counties where the games were held? FindingsThis time-series, cross-sectional study of U.S. counties with NFL and NCAA football games used matching and difference-in-differences design to estimate the effect of games with limited in-person attendance on county-level COVID-19 spread. Our study does not find an increase in county-level COVID-19 cases per 100,000 residents due to NFL and NCAA football games held with limited in-person attendance. MeaningThis study suggests that NFL and NCAA games held with limited in-person attendance do not cause an increase in COVID-19 cases in the counties they are held.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Can tracking mobility be used as a public health tool against COVID-19 following the expiration of stay-at-home mandates? 95%
- A Comprehensive County Level Framework to Identify Factors Affecting Hospital Capacity and Predict Future Hospital Demand 93%
- Public Mobility Data Enables COVID-19 Forecasting and Management at Local and Global Scales 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between vaccination rates and COVID-19 health outcomes in the United States: a population-level statistical analysis 95%
- Inclusive Health: Modeling COVID-19 In Correctional Facilities And Communities 94%
- The effect of smaller classes on infection-related school absence: Evidence from the Project STAR randomized controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Flexible Framework for Local-Level Estimation of the Effective Reproductive Number in Geographic Regions with Sparse Data 93%
- External control arm analysis: an evaluation of propensity score approaches, G-computation, and doubly debiased machine learning 92%
- Over- and under-estimation of vaccine effectiveness 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Public Preferences for Social Distancing Behaviors to Mitigate the Spread of COVID-19: A Discrete Choice Experiment 93%
- The Joint Impact of COVID-19 Vaccination and Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions on Infections, Hospitalizations, and Mortality: An Agent-Based Simulation 92%
- Contributions of occupation characteristics and educational attainment to racial/ethnic inequities in COVID-19 mortality 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.