Multiple time scales of adaptation allow cones to encode the inputs created by visual exploration of natural scenes
Angueyra, J. M.; Baudin, J.; Schwartz, G. W.; Rieke, F.
Show abstract
Primates explore their visual environment by making frequent saccades, discrete and ballistic eye movements that direct the fovea to specific regions of interest. Saccades produce large and rapid changes in input. The magnitude of these changes and the limited signaling range of visual neurons means that effective encoding requires rapid adaptation. Here, we explore how cone photoreceptors maintain sensitivity under these conditions. Adaptation makes cone responses to naturalistic stimuli highly nonlinear and dependent on stimulus history. Such responses cannot be explained by linear or linear-nonlinear models but are well explained by a biophysical model of phototransduction with fast and slow adaptational mechanisms. The resulting model can predict cone responses to a broad range of stimuli and enables the design of stimuli that elicit specific (e.g. linear) cone photocurrents. These advances will provide a foundation for investigating the contributions of cones and post-cone processing to visual function.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictably manipulating photoreceptor light responses to reveal their role in downstream visual responses 98%
- The computation of directional selectivity in the Drosophila OFF motion pathway 96%
- Properties of multi-vesicular release from rod photoreceptors support transmission of single photon responses 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A minimal synaptic model for direction selective neurons in Drosophila 96%
- Continuous psychophysics shows millisecond-scale visual processing delays are faithfully preserved in movement dynamics 93%
- A computational observer model of spatial contrast sensitivity: Effects of photocurrent encoding, fixational eye movements and inference engine 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.