Back

Serum Markers Predict Brain Death Due to Trauma and Hypoxia Within 32 hours of Injury

Rafter, D.; Sterk, B.; Li, Z.; Schaaf, T.; Kuang, R.; Samadani, U.

2021-02-18 neurology
10.1101/2021.02.13.21251369 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPrediction of which traumatic and hypoxic brain injuries will progress to brain death is currently based predominantly on history, physical examination and radiographic findings. We investigated how accurately purely objective measures including three neurologic serum markers and algorithmic CT (computed tomograph) scan analysis can predict brain death and differentiate its etiology. MethodsThis prospective observational study enrolled 51 isolated trauma subjects and 19 clinically brain dead subjects that were further divided by mechanism of injury into high-velocity trauma with presumed diffuse axonal injury, cardiopulmonary/respiratory arrest, and found down groups. Levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), and S100 Calcium-Binding Protein B (S100B) were compared, and algorithmic analysis of CT scan imaging was performed using an open-source deep learning software (BLAST-CT). FindingsThe prognostic value of various biomarker combinations in identifying subjects progressing to brain death was assessed using machine learning. Prediction accuracy for GFAP, UCH-L1, and S100B and algorithmic CT analysis in combination to predict brain death from among all other cohorts yielded an area under the receiver operator curve of 0.98 versus all other brain injury subjects. This model was also able to distinguish brain death attributed to cardiopulmonary/respiratory arrest from combined non-trauma controls and diffuse axonal injury with an area under the curve of 0.99. InterpretationSerum concentrations of GFAP, UCH-L1, and S100B measured within 32 hours of traumatic and hypoxic brain injury (cardiopulmonary/respiratory arrest) and algorithmic CT analysis have utility in prognosticating brain death and predicting its mechanism of injury as either hypoxic or traumatic/unknown (diffuse axonal injury/found down). FundingAbbott Labs and the Minnesota State Office of Higher Education.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.9%
2
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.5%
50% of probability mass above
3
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
5
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
6
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
9
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
10
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
13
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
14
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
15
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
16
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
17
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
19
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
21
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%