Animal soundscapes reveal key markers of Amazon forest degradation from fire and logging
Rappaport, D. I.; Swain, A.; Fagan, W. F.; Dubayah, R.; Morton, D. C.
Show abstract
Safeguarding tropical forest biodiversity requires solutions for monitoring ecosystem composition over time. In the Amazon, logging and fire reduce forest carbon stocks and alter tree species diversity, but the long-term consequences for wildlife remain unclear, especially for lesser-known taxa. Here, we combined data from multi-day acoustic surveys, airborne lidar, and satellite timeseries covering logged and burned forests (n=39) in the southern Brazilian Amazon to identify acoustic markers of degradation. Our findings contradict theoretical expectations from the Acoustic Niche Hypothesis that animal communities in more degraded habitats occupy fewer acoustic niches. Instead, we found that habitat structure (e.g., aboveground biomass) was not a consistent proxy for biodiversity based on divergent patterns of acoustic space occupancy (ASO) in logged and burned forests. Full 24-hr soundscapes highlighted a stark and sustained reorganization in community structure after multiple fires; animal communication networks were quieter, more homogenous, and less acoustically integrated in forests burned multiple times than in logged or once-burned forests. These findings demonstrate strong biodiversity co-benefits from protecting Amazon forests from recurrent fire activity. By contrast, soundscape changes after logging were subtle and more consistent with community recovery than reassembly. In both logged and burned forests, insects were the dominant acoustic markers of degradation, particularly during midday and nighttime hours that are not typically sampled by traditional field surveys of biodiversity. The acoustic fingerprints of degradation history were conserved across replicate recording locations at each site, indicating that soundscapes offer a robust, taxonomically inclusive solution for tracking changes in community composition over time. Significance StatementFire and logging reduce the carbon stored in Amazon forests, but little is known about how human degradation alters animal communities. We recorded thousands of hours of ecosystem sounds to investigate animal community assembly and the associations between biodiversity and biomass following Amazon forest degradation over time. 24-hr patterns of acoustic activity differed between logged and burned forests, and we observed large and sustained breakpoints in community structure after multiple burns. Soundscape differences among degraded forests were clearest during insect-dominated hours rarely sampled in field studies of biodiversity. These findings demonstrate that acoustic monitoring holds promise for routine biodiversity accounting, even by non-experts, to capture a holistic measure of animal communities in degraded tropical forests and benchmark change over time.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Landscape diversity and local temperature, but not climate, affect arthropod predation among habitat types 93%
- Twenty years of change in benthic communities across the Belizean Barrier Reef 91%
- Landscape structure shapes tree seedlings diversity at multiple spatial scales in a fragmented tropical rainforest 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ant impacts on global patterns of bird elevational diversity 93%
- Arrive and wait: inactive bacterial taxa contribute to perceived soil microbiome resilience after a multidecadal press disturbance 92%
- The multidimensional nutritional niche of fungus-cultivar provisioning in free-ranging colonies of a neotropical leafcutter ant 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Treeline ecotones shape the distribution of avian species richness and functional diversity in south temperate mountains 92%
- Big trees drive forest structure patterns across a lowland Amazon regrowth gradient 91%
- Uneven declines between corals and cryptobenthic fish symbionts from multiple disturbances 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.